chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Efim Geller vs Evgeni Vasiukov
13th Soviet Team-ch final A (1975), Riga LAT, rd 2, Jul-??
Sicilian Defense: Paulsen. Bastrikov Variation (B47)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Get this game explained with Decode Chess
explore this opening
find similar games 12 more Geller/Vasiukov games
sac: 17.Bxf4 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
May-31-04  Tigran Petrosian: Nice sac.
Jan-26-06  waddayaplay: But why didn't he take the bishop on move 38?
Nov-13-07  hnishy: Many mistakes for both sides. Geller, in his book 'Application of Chess Theory', claims the position after 32.Rd3 is 'very difficult for Black to find a reasonable continuation. White. But Black has more than one riposte; 32...Ng5! 33.hg5 hg5+ 34.Kg1 Ba7+ (I spotted this line myself) and 32....Re1! (Fritz's first choice).
Jan-01-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  Peligroso Patzer: <But why didn't he take the bishop on move 38?>

Both players were in time pressure. The comments by <hnishy> re: move 32 are pertinent in this regard, but the position was so complicated, even Geller's notes overlook the two good choices available to Black at that turn. A couple of moves later, Vasiukov obviously overlooked 34. Qf6!, after which there were many winning choices for White at each move. Possibly because Geller missed the strongest 38. Qxb8, the last move that he gives in "The Application of Chess Theory" (Everyman Chess, (c)1984, 1994, at page 69) is 37. Qh8+ with the comment, "and within a few moves Black resigned."

Jan-01-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  Peligroso Patzer: Just noticed something interesting: The score here differs from that given in "The Application of Chess Theory", op. cit. Here, Black's 29th move is given as 29. ... Rd6, whereas Geller's book gives 29. ... Re5.

With 32. ... Rxd5, the two scores converge, but with the Rook on e5 (instead of d6) there is a significant difference in the position after 32. Rd3. With the Rook on e5, possible is 32. ... Re1!! (whereas, with the Rook on d6, then possibly there would be nothing better than 32. ... Rxd5, as played by Vasiukov).

Jan-01-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  Peligroso Patzer: Taking another look at the hypothetical position after 32. Rd3 (with the Black Rook on d6, as per the moves currently given in the CG database, instead of on e5, as per Geller's book), winning would be 32. ... Nf4! (with, among other threats, a discovered attack on the White Queen by the [hypothetically positioned] d6-Rook along the 6th rank).
Jan-01-10  returnoftheking: Is 23. Bg4 a mistake, and should Nc7 have been played instead?

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
. 3rd board (Rus.-Mos.)
from Spartakiada 1975 Riga by Kopenhagener
Don't betray yourself
from The Application of Chess Theory by nakul1964
Game 29
from Application of Chess Theory (Geller) by Qindarka
Game 29
from Application of Chess Theory (Geller) by Okavango
Don't betray yourself
from The Application of Chess Theory by xajik
Game 29
from Application of Chess Theory (Geller) by skisuitof12
Don't betray yourself
from The Application of Chess Theory by Benzol

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2021, Chessgames Services LLC