chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Boris Gelfand vs Garry Kasparov
Linares (1992), Linares ESP, rd 5, Feb-29
King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation. Gligoric-Taimanov System (E92)  ·  0-1

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 21 times; par: 99 [what's this?]

Get this game explained with Decode Chess
explore this opening
find similar games 20 more Gelfand/Kasparov games
sac: 13...Rxe3 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can make these tips go away by registering a free account then visiting your preferences page. Simply check the option "Don't show random tips on game pages." and click the Update Profile button at the bottom.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
May-04-05  BlazingArrow56: Kasparov plays this endgame to perfection!
May-04-05  Poulsen: Sure, but when did the endgame begin?

Whites loss of a pawn in move 15 proves decisive - from that point on black has the initiative AND a material advantage. No wonder that K. won - and no surprise, that it took additional 45 moves or so.

May-04-05  lopium: 13.Rxe3 !! I don't really understand the sacrifice. Maybe only positional, but I guess Kasparov wouldn't have played this move against Deep Junior!
May-04-05  maoam: <lopium>

Kasparov prepared the brilliant 13...Rxe3 for his match with Karpov in 1990. Black get's a huge amount of compensation on the dark squares. What's more, I'm not sure it'd be a bad choice against Deep Junior, after all it came up with 17...0-0! used in Kasimdzhanov vs Kasparov, 2005.

May-04-05  BlazingArrow56: I just read 15. Ncb5 was a prepared novelty by Gelfand. There may be an improvement in there but once Kasparov gets two pawns for the exchange its over.
Dec-29-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  kingscrusher: Brilliant exchange sac. I have video annotated this game at:-

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=29Lj...

Sep-06-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  notyetagm: http://www.chesscafe.com/yaz/yaz.htm

<13 ... Rxe3!?

Yes, indeed! Kasparov, like no other, believes in his ideas. For a full explanation about this sacrifice read my book, Five Crowns.>

<26 ... Bg1+!

Correctly playing for the win. Black will have two pawns for the exchange, but more importantly his pieces play a more active role. For example, contemplate the f1-bishop’s role. The overriding considerations for Kasparov in declining the repetition are the open files. White’s rooks will have to penetrate on c7, c8, e7, and/or e8. Since the bishop on h2 will cover c7 and the d7-bishop covers e8 and c8, the remaining “business square” is e7. Black’s king can always slide to f8, so that covers all the bases. <If White is without active rooks and saddled with a passive bishop, Black’s losing chances are nil.>>

<28 ... Rd8!

<An important principle in such positions is to avoid exchanging the major pieces when an exchange down.> The extra major piece acts as an important defender. Also, the difference in strength between rooks and minors are emphasized when the minors have to face the rook alone.>

Sep-07-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  notyetagm: 60 ... ♖f2xg2 0-1


click for larger view

http://www.chesscafe.com/yaz/yaz.htm:

<Adjourned, but White resigned without resuming. After 61.Kxe5 Bf6+ 62.Kxf6 Rxg8 63.Bxg8 d3 is a case of the overworked bishop. Another very impressive game by Kasparov.>


click for larger view

And now the light-squared White g8-bishop will soon be <OVERWORKED> as it will not be possible for the White bishop to prevent both the Black d3- and h4-passers from promoting by controlling only *one* diagonal.

Sep-07-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  notyetagm: <lopium: 13.Rxe3 !! I don't really understand the sacrifice. Maybe only positional, but I guess Kasparov wouldn't have played this move against Deep Junior!>

http://www.chesscafe.com/text/yaz85...:

<Yes, indeed! Kasparov, like no other, believes in his ideas. For a full explanation about this sacrifice read my book, Five Crowns.>

Seirawan is saying that he explains this <EXCHANGE SACRIFICE> 13 ... ♖e8x♗e3! in detail in his "Five Crowns" book, as Kasparov first played this idea in his 1990 World Championship match against Karpov.

Jan-03-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  notyetagm: 28 ... ?


click for larger view

White has just played 28 ♖d1-e1, offering to trade rooks. Should Black acquiesce to the trade?

28 ... ♖e8-d8! (Seirawan)


click for larger view

Not just no, HELL NO!

http://www.chesscafe.com/text/yaz85...

Seirawan: <<An important principle in such positions is to avoid exchanging the major pieces when an exchange down.> The extra major piece acts as an important defender. Also, the difference in strength between rooks and minors are emphasized when the minors have to face the rook alone.>

That is,

♖♖ > ♖♗

but

♖ >> ♗

I made this *exact* strategic mistake in a club game recently, trading off rooks when down the exchange in an endgame. I thought my centralized knight would be strong enough to fight the rook but it was <NO MATCH>. Rooks are just *overwhelmingly* strong in the endgame, much much much stronger than a minor piece.

Jan-03-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  notyetagm: See Wheeler vs notyetagm December Demolition Sven Brask Chess Club 2009 for all the gory details.
Jan-04-10  kingsindian2006: this is a hidden gem of kaspy... beauty of a game
Mar-31-12  PinnedPiece: GTM: Score 85 Par 98

Me skunked although I did go Bg1 before Kasparov, to remove the h2 pawn. Didn't have a lot of time to get through this lengthy game. Very enjoyable, however.

Apr-15-12  Hankanintetrolla: The black bishop in KID is a killer.
Apr-15-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  moronovich: <Hankanintetrolla>

Quite a handle youve got there ;)

May-05-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  Honza Cervenka: 21.Nc2 was bad. 21.a3 allows black to force draw immediately with 21...Na2 22.Rb3 (the Rook must stay on the third rank to cover point e3) 22...Nc1 23.Rc3 Na2 etc., and he is not forced to do that but I don't see any clear way to significant advantage there at least. Also 21.a4 can be worth of consideration.
May-05-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  Honza Cervenka: 47.Be4 could have been better than 47.Ke2. If black plays 47...Ne3+, then 48.Ke2 Nxg2 49.Rxd4 seems to be more defensible ending for white than that in the game.

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Linares 1992
by Tabanus
63 ... d4-d3 White g8-bishop cannot stop *both* d3-,h4-passers
from OVERLOADED! by notyetagm
KID for black
by shakespeare
Chess Informant Best Games 3
by Nimzophile
Kasparov The Killer!!
by Zhbugnoimt
63 ... d4-d3 White g8-bishop cannot stop *both* d3-,h4-passers
from OVERLOADED! by Miguel Medina
Kasparov The Killer!!
by wvb933
King's Indian 13...Rxe3!? redux
from Exchange Sacrifices by FSR
KID for black
by Retarf
The KID
by Zhbugnoimt
Size GAZA
by lonchaney
King's Indian Defense
by SpiritedReposte
Game 538
from # Chess Informant Best Games 501-600 by Qindarka
Gelfand's improvement down the drain.
from Kasparov and his KID by little fluffy
Round Five, Game #32
from Linares 1992 by suenteus po 147
King's Indian
by ALL
E92 0-1 60
from KID Warlords of 21st Century Follow Fredthebear by rbaglini
28 ... Re8-d8! Kasparov avoids rook trade when exchange down
from Do not trade rooks when down the exchange! by notyetagm
A2
from 98_KID_Maroczy-Bind-Structure P(c4/e4) vs P(c6/d by whiteshark
Chess as an art form. Part 2
by hatter81
plus 18 more collections (not shown)

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2021, Chessgames Services LLC