chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Robert James Fischer vs William Addison
Palma de Mallorca Interzonal (1970), Palma de Mallorca ESP, rd 3, Nov-11
Scandinavian Defense: Ilundain Variation (B01)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 54 times; par: 36 [what's this?]

Get this game explained with Decode Chess
explore this opening
find similar games 5 more Fischer/W Addison games
sac: 21.Rxd5 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You should register a free account to activate some of Chessgames.com's coolest and most powerful features.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Dec-23-07  PKNJ: Frank Brady wrote in 'Profile of a Prodigy,' his Fischer bio, that "Addison's Center Counter Defense brought a wide smile to Fischer's face."
Dec-23-08  KingG: Black should probably have tried 13...f5, trying to get some counterplay, and preventing White from taking control of the e4 and f5 squares as in the game.
Jan-08-09  PugnaciousPawn: The Scandinavian can actually be an effective weapon, but you must be precise! 3...Qd8 was Addison's first mistake, as 3...Qa5 is the correct move in the system. Defenses like the Scandinavian take the opponent out of book lines.
Mar-04-09  fischerstein: Addison played this opening like a patzer. I think that 6... Qc8 was horrible. Nc6 would have been much better. After only 7 moves he's way behind in development and his queen side is just ridiculous. Anyway, he brought it upon himself by playing the Scandinavian the way he did.
Mar-04-09  Jim Bartle: Fischerstein: How would black have continued after 6...Nc6 7 Qxf5?
Mar-04-09  Absentee: What was Addison thinking, playing the scandinavian against Fischer?
May-01-09  ToTheDeath: <Jim Bartle: Fischerstein: How would black have continued after 6...Nc6 7 Qxf5?>

LOL.

Nice game by Fischer- it's a bit like his famous win over Najdorf actually.

Fischer vs Najdorf, 1962

Oct-06-11  jbtigerwolf: Fischer has it going on, but this resignation looks premature.
Oct-06-11  jbtigerwolf: Actually... I see it! Fischer goes a pawn down, but opens his c-file. Not only that, but attacking with Rc1 puts his Rook at the base of that c-file. He has what I have learned is an 'isolani pawn structure' and it's beautiful. He gets tempi too! I think I might adopt this tactic.
Nov-21-11  SoundWave: <PugnaciousPawn: 3...Qd8 was Addison's first mistake, as 3...Qa5 is the correct move in the system.>

3...Qd8 is a perfectly playable line although Qa5 is perhaps slightly better.

Nov-21-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  SteinitzLives: Actually, the rage is now 3. . . . Qd6. Svidlar uses it.
Nov-21-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  harrylime: < SteinitzLives: Actually, the rage is now 3. . . . Qd6. Svidlar uses it. >

Cool. Would've loved to have seen Svidlar playing Qd6 against Fischer..

Oh, sorry, might add, against a Fischer armed with a Lap Top .. lol

Nov-21-11  AnalyzeThis: Addison tried to make this a sloppy tactical game (best chance against Fischer), but Fischer was stronger than him at tactics too. In hindsight, I think Addison did the best he could.
Jul-27-12  JoergWalter: <AnalyzeThis: Addison tried to make this a sloppy tactical game (best chance against Fischer)...>

took Fischer a handful of excellent moves to demonstrate that:

7.Bg5!
11.Bxf6!
13.Bb5!
16.h4!
18.Nce4!

and the thing is done.

Jul-29-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  diceman: <Absentee:
What was Addison thinking, playing the scandinavian against Fischer?>

Fischer finished 3.5 points ahead of the field with 15 wins, 1 loss, and 7 draws.

I don’t think Addison was the important element in this game. :):):)

Jul-29-12  JoergWalter: Addison would have become a professional chess player had he qualified in that tournament. I guess he became a lawyer.
However, he drew Karpov in an exciting breathtaking game

W G Addison vs Karpov, 1970

Jul-29-12  master of defence: Why not 23...Qxb1+ 22.Bxb1 Bxb1? Isn´t better for black
Jul-29-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: <master of defence> The snag is that 25.Nc7+ Kd7 26.Nxa8 wins, as Black loses his other rook if he snatches the knight on a8.
Jul-29-12  RookFile: <What was Addison thinking?>

My guess is he had the same thought Viktor Krueger had in Highlander:

"I'd rather burn out than fade away".

That is, he could play some defense like the Ruy Lopez and get ground down in 45 moves over so, without mercy.

Or, he can take a shot and try to make this a sloppy tactical game.

His execution was flawed, but on a high level, I think he had the right idea, playing against a much stronger opponent.

Jul-31-12  JoergWalter: here is a video on this game

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Np7J...

Feb-09-15  Howard: If you want to see this game annotated at roughly a class-D level, then simply Google...

"Fischer" and "Addison" and "California, here I came"....

In other words, the late Larry Evans went over this game in the April, 1971 issue of Boys' Life. Still remember that !

May-05-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  Honza Cervenka: I don't like 13.Bb5. This move seems to lose momentum of white's initiative for a moment, and black could have got quite decent game after 13...f5! as <KingG> suggested years ago. Instead of that 13.h4! (threatening h5 and forcing thus black's reply) 13...h5 14.Ng3 with firm control of e4-f5 was more precise continuation.
May-15-21
Premium Chessgames Member
  kingscrusher: <JoergeWalter> I appreciate the age of analysis without any computer help. It does highlight though that the analysis in that video is very technically flawed indeed but it does have some good fundamental points to make of course.

It is interesting to think that two grandmasters and one of them being Karpov (but encouraged by Henley to agree with some comments) without computers get a lot of technical details really wrong.

As one example they both suggest intuitively that Bxc2 is because otherwise White would castle queenside. This is very "romantic" analysis for beginners. The thing is if instead of Bxc2 say e6 and then 0-0-0

Black would have Bg4 which is more than a technical issue:


click for larger view

OUCH!

Then later, there is a suggestion that gxf6 was played because if Nxf6 then another romantic notion is introduced that white would somehow smash through with d5. It seems in fact that 11...Nf6 would have been far more solid than gxf6. E.g.

11...Nxf6
12. d5 e5!

And black is just equal here


click for larger view

Which does actually tend to question the root cause here - was Fischer right in fact in playing the committal 11.Bxf6

For me it seems Fischer took all sorts of risks against what he saw the weaker players of the opponent. In the analysis here at Chessgames.com the analysis seems to go to the reverse end of objectivity in such games when in fact in a large number of instances the weaker players had great resources and opportunities. This game is no different.

Objective analysis with the help of computers does help reveal the truth of positions and can navigate in my view to more solid strategies and ideas.

Objectively it seems 11.Bxf6 by Fischer is actually a mistake.

It turns out it seems there is a far more powerful idea:

11.Nf4

Then if ...Be7

Bxe6!


click for larger view

And this is a big advantage for White independent of whatever black does.

May-15-21
Premium Chessgames Member
  kingscrusher: (continued...) I think maybe the issue with e5 from analysis at the time pre-computers is that actually, Nb5 looks terrifying:


click for larger view

There are threats of Nxc7+ and Bb5+

But it seems black here has Bc5 which kind of proves Fischer may have taken a risk with Bxf6 earlier - giving the opponent the dark squared bishop:


click for larger view

This seems fine for black objectively

May-15-21
Premium Chessgames Member
  beatgiant: <kingscrusher> <if instead of Bxc2 say e6 and then 0-0-0 Black would have Bg4> I checked the video. They were talking in general terms about White's plan of development and not a specific line. Of course it's understood the plan requires due preparation.

Also I agree that 11. Nf4! is a big improvement over the game, but after the suggested 11. Bxf6 Nxf6 12. d5 e5 13. Nb5 Bc5, <14. d6> does not quite look fine for Black to me.

search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
mneuwirth's endgames
by mneuwirth
Frank Brady wrote 'Profile of a Prodigy,'
from A Players Announced to Fredthebear's Audience by Patca63
17: 21. Rxd5
from Pandolfini's "Bobby Fischer's Outrageous Moves" by blingice
Game 67
from Veliki majstori saha 30 FISCHER (II) -Marovic by Chessdreamer
Frank Brady wrote 'Profile of a Prodigy,'
from -ER Fischer by fredthebear
Game 67 from Veliki majstori saha 30 FISCHER (II) -Marovic
from Publications by Year and Unconfirmed Source 23 by fredthebear
457 21.
from Sharpen Your Tactics Tactics 350-700 by Sharpen Your Tactics
Bobby Fischer's Path To World Champion
by LionHeart40
3...Qd8 4.d4 Nf6 5.Bc4 Bf5 6.Qf3 Qc8 7.Bg5 Bxc2 8.Rc1 Bg6
from tpstar CC by tpstar
A3: Scandinavian Defense: Ilundain Variation
from Scandinavian Defense-White wins by imsighked2
Bobby Fischer's Path To World Champion
by foxmt
Robert J. Fischer Collection [White]
by MichaelMichael
Robert Fischer's Best Games
by KingG
WSS pg 10 moe 12 d5! to eog
from Secrets of Positional Chess- Drazen Marovic by Del ToRo
Robert Fischer's Best Games
by Patca63
Jimen1
by Jimen

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2021, Chessgames Services LLC