Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Richard Reti vs Max Euwe
"Not Worth a Second Rook" (game of the day Sep-16-2011)
Match (1920), Rotterdam NED, rd 4
Dutch Defense: Staunton Gambit. Lasker Variation (A83)  ·  1-0



Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 97 times; par: 25 [what's this?]

Get this game explained with Decode Chess
explore this opening
find similar games 12 more Reti/Euwe games
sac: 11.Nxd5 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: To see the raw PGN for this game, click on the PGN: view link above.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.


Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 3 OF 4 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Jan-17-18  zanzibar: <<RB> Does anybody know when the match was played?>

Is <sneaky>'s June good enough for you?

Otherwise, we'll have to teach you how to use delpner.

Jan-17-18  zanzibar: Tartajubow talks about this match

(It's a shame we can't just open a tournament page (or a temporary one) for comments while putting together the details of the match. Would be good for working notes, etc.)

Also here:

<CT> has six of the games, <CG> seems to only have five:

Jan-17-18  zanzibar: <CB> also has only 5, but <NIC> has 7.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Retireborn: <sneaky pete> Many thanks, as ever, for your help with my Dutch queries.

<z> The fifth game in your <CG> link would seem to be from the Amsterdam tournament just before the match.

<CT> does show a Reti-Euwe game which is new to me. I have doubts about its authenticity; that Winawer line with 7.Qg4 0-0 is rather modern and I'd be surprised to learn that Euwe was playing it in 1920.

My link to NiC is broken, or rather only takes me to their bookshop. Do you have a link to search their database?

If more than four games really were played in this match I'd be very interested to see them.

Jan-17-18  zanzibar: <RB> perhaps the first place to look into these matters, because of his general reliability, accuracy, and organization is Rod Edwards' EDOchess site:

He doesn't always get it right though. Originally he relied on secondary sources, like Gaige and De Felice, quite a bit, but I've noticed a welcome trend of his towards utilizing primary sources. I think this is partially due to his recent collaborations with Harding, but it might just be that he's been bitten by "the bug".

That said, I'm fairly confident that he under-represents the games in this match(*). Tartajubow opens his page on the match with this paragraph:

<A reader has asked if I would do a post on the 1920 Euwe-Reti match and asked if it was an informal series of games. Finding information on this match turned out not to be so simple! One source I saw claimed that it was an 8-game match with the result of 5-3 with four draws in Reti's favor, but all other sources favor four games. In any case, it seems the match didn't attract much attention outside The Netherlands because neither the 1920 issues of the American Chess Bulletin nor The British Chess Magazine make mention of it. If it was for eight games, most of them seem not to have survived! >

I'll try to look into all this over on my blog - so just pop by now and again for an update.

(E.g. I'm pretty sure the Dutch newspaper archive, Delpher, has most, if not all, of the games:


Since you asked, here's two online DB links I use fairly regularly:

<CB> -
<NIC> -

(*) Although DutchBase also only has 4 games.


Jan-17-18  zanzibar: (The draws might not have been published, but I suspect they were reported - just a hunch)
Jan-17-18  zanzibar: <RB> as for what game was what round... that will need some work.

I do have a contemporaneous report where the 2nd game (tweede partie) starts 1.d4 d5, so this game ain't it.

Jan-17-18  dumbgai: Is it just me or does ...Qxb2 always lose?
Premium Chessgames Member
  Retireborn: <z> Many thanks for your help, much appreciated.

Looking at the 7 games listed by NiC base, the two C55 games are essentially identical (usually given as 1st game of match), as are the two A82 games (usually given as the second game.) The Tarrasch game with 10.Na4 appears to be their game from the Amsterdam tourney, not the other Tarrasch with 10.Bg5 which is usually presented as the fourth game of the match (but may be the second game, according your contemporaneous report.)

So as far as NiC is concerned, we're again reduced to the four known games plus the mysterious Winawer game. One problen I have with it is it ends 1-0 even though the position is equal. Perhaps it was drawn there, or further unknown moves were played.

As I've said I doubt its authenticity, but if Reti and Euwe were really playing 7.Qg4 0-0 at least 10 years before anybody else, it would be nice to give them credit for it.

Jan-18-18  zanzibar: The first two Reti--Euwe match games were played before the Amsterdam tournament, as reported on 1920-05-22.

The tournament began on the 23th, so the final two match games likely were played in June, matching the newspaper accounts.

Only four games were played, all decisive.

Premium Chessgames Member
  Retireborn: <z> Many thanks once again. Interestingly (or perhaps not) the 1932 Euwe v Flohr match was also split in two around a tournament in Bern, as I recall.
Jan-18-18  zanzibar: <RB> the 3rd game was probably played before the tournament as well... but I'm reasonably sure the 4th game was in June. I'll double-check all this after the 1st pass - right now it's still working notes.
Premium Chessgames Member
  sneaky pete: From delpher this link to the weekly chess column by Van Trotsenburg in the Algemeen Handelsblad of Saturday June 19, 1920.

It states that this was the 4th and last game of the match.

I also found the column of June 5 (same editor and newspaper) with the second game, the QGD Tarrasch Defence won by Réti. So the game numbering here is right, and Münninghoff was wrong. But at least we know now that this 4th game was played in June.

Premium Chessgames Member
  Retireborn: <sneaky pete> Many thanks again. I've been able to adjust my Chessbase data accordingly.
Jan-18-18  zanzibar: <RB> you'll likely have to adjust it again too.
Jan-18-18  zanzibar: Biographer Bistro (kibitz #17476)

I think this game is best dated from June 5, 1920. Details can be found in the PGN comments by following the link-chain above.

Premium Chessgames Member
  al wazir: Euwe was 19 when this game was played.
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: Strange problem, since the Stockfish analysis given with the game says that White's 10th and 11th moves were both blunders, giving Black a winning advantage, and that White's 13th move was inferior. However, Stockfish doesn't say where Black should have improved and won his won game instead of being mated into oblivion. I'm confused.
Premium Chessgames Member
  agb2002: A bit too famous.
May-03-20  mel gibson: A very strange game.

Stockfish 11 says the answer is to castle.

10. O-O

(10. O-O (O-O c5-c4 ♖a1-b1 ♕b2-a3 ♘c3-b5
♕a3-c5+ ♗g5-e3 ♗g7-h6 ♗e3xc5 ♗h6xd2 ♘b5-c7+ ♔e8-d8 ♘c7xa8 c4xd3 ♘f3xd2 d7-d6 ♗c5xa7 d3xc2 ♖b1-b2 ♘b8-a6 ♗a7-b6+ ♔d8-e8 ♗b6-d4 ♖h8-f8 ♗d4xf6 ♖f8xf6 ♖b2xc2 ♖f6xf1+ ♔g1xf1 ♘a6-c5 ♖c2-c3 ♗c8-f5 ♘a8-b6 ♔e8-d8 ♔f1-e2 e7-e6 ♘d2-b3 ♔d8-c7 ♘b6-a8+ ♔c7-d7 ♘b3xc5+ d6xc5 ♖c3xc5 ♔d7-d6 ♖c5-c7 e6xd5 ♖c7xh7 d5-d4 ♘a8-b6 ♔d6-c5 ♘b6-d7+ ♔c5-d6 ♘d7-f6 ♔d6-e6 ♘f6-e8 ♗f5-e4 g2-g3) +6.47/35 104)

score for White +6.47 depth 35

May-03-20  Brenin: Does 13 Nc7+ also win, e.g. Kd8 14 Bxe7+ Kxc7 15 Qf4+, or 13 ... Kxe7 14 Qg5+ ? Alternatives 13 ... Kf8 or Kf7 don't look any better.
May-03-20  goodevans: <Brenin: Does 13 Nc7+ also win...> Looks to me like it does indeed.
May-03-20  goodevans: < FSR: [...] I'm confused.>

... but probably not as confused as Stockfish!

Somewhere in the SF algorithm it must truncate branches that it decides aren't worth pursuing. I can only assume it has lopped off branches that turn out to be winning for white, though quite why I have no idea.

I have posted before about positions that SF doesn't seem to understand but it's a long time since I've come across it being as confused as it is here.

Premium Chessgames Member
  chrisowen: Reti record don't fade away no?
Premium Chessgames Member
  chrisowen: Fab b1 no?
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 4)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 3 OF 4 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.

NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Dutch Staunton Gambit. Lasker Var (A83) 1-0 Dbl Rook Sac smack
from Dallas, The Big D is Blue by fredthebear
LuisHarrouch's immortal games 2
by LuisHarrouch
Game 9
from World Champion - Euwe (I.Linder/V.Linder) by Qindarka
Reti was breathing fire that day; Double rook sac
from Headed to Holland Next Year with Fredthebear by fredthebear
10.? (Sunday, May 3)
from POTD Dutch by takchess
Who needs rooks? - 11.Nxd5!!
from The best moves of chess by My Face
Capthahn86's favorite games
by Capthahn86
Reti show his skills
from DrChopper's favorite games of all times by DrChopper
by saveyougod
Bookmarked miniatures
by Halfpricemidge
by mneuwirth
1. d4!
by Benjamin Lau
Is that Rook free?... Take it if you've got the guts.
from Awesome Games by meetjain2295
Staunton Gambit
by littleshiva
from Checkmates 18+ by Kasputin

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2021, Chessgames Services LLC