Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Frank Marshall vs Harry Nelson Pillsbury
Cambridge Springs (1904), Cambridge Springs, PA USA, rd 2, Apr-26
Pirc Defense: Austrian Attack (B09)  ·  1-0



Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 69 times; par: 34 [what's this?]

Get this game explained with Decode Chess
explore this opening
find similar games 13 more Marshall/Pillsbury games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: If we are missing an important game, you can submit it (in PGN format) at our PGN Upload Utility.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.


Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 6 OF 6 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Apr-03-14  TheFocus: <onedog> should learn the proper use of punctuation.
Apr-03-14  landogriffin: @ <patzer2> thanks a lot for this, although I think you are giving me more credit than I deserve! :)
Apr-03-14  LIFE Master AJ: <off> As your handle implies, you are simply "OFF." (center)
Apr-03-14  LIFE Master AJ: off target
Apr-03-14  LIFE Master AJ: ... and just about everything else as well.
Apr-03-14  PJs Studio: Boy. You guys take this analysis to extremes!
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: <PJs Studio: Boy. You guys take this analysis to extremes!>

Chess players can analyse anything; you should see my brilliant and scathing criticism of <Zukertort's headstone> at Johannes Zukertort.

Apr-03-14  onedog: OhioChessFan: My eyes are bleeding after reading this run-on sentence. An expert?

Yes, my dear, an expert. Just because a sentence is long, doesn't make it a run-on sentence. Check your grammar. I know you belong to the three-second attention span generation, but does that mean you can't follow a sentence of more than ten words, even with punctuation there to help you? Poor you.

Apr-03-14  onedog: TheFocus: please point out one punctuation error in one of my kibitzes. I would love to learn the error of my ways from you.
Apr-04-14  LIFE Master AJ: <My eyes are bleeding after reading this run-on sentence. An expert?>

I almost lost control of my senses (and some other faculties) ... after reading this. ROFL!!!!!

Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: <onedog: TheFocus: please point out one punctuation error in one of my kibitzes. I would love to learn the error of my ways from you.> I have not seen any errors in the posts of yours that I have read.
Apr-04-14  LIFE Master AJ: I would bet he's a dog catcher ... pretending to be a rocket scientist.
Apr-04-14  schweigzwang: Oh the irony.
Apr-04-14  TheFocus: <onedog> <TheFocus><please point out one punctuation error in one of my kibitzes. I would love to learn the error of my ways from you.> From <Simon Kim Williams vs The World>: <I believe white is far from lost, in fact I think those who think we are winning might be a little optimistic.>

You might want to buy a semi-colon to place after "far from lost,". Or a period instead of a comma. You could also have placed a comma after: "in fact".

This would have looked better: <I believe white is far from lost; in fact, I think those who think we are winning might be a little optimistic.>. Or this: <I believe white is far from lost. In fact, I think those who think we are winning might be a little optimistic.>

In your run-on sentence, you should have used a semi-colon (again). I will leave it to you to figure out where.

Jun-09-14  Castleinthesky: Despite all the mindless blather below, this is a great game in the truest sense of the Romantics.
Dec-13-14  TheBish: Yes, thank you Castleinthesky! This is supposed to be a forum for discussing the above game (or so we would be led to believe, if we believe the rules and guidelines of And this is a classic game, so it's a shame to play over it and expect to see some great analysis or historical insight or whatnot -- and have to wade through so much ego jousting! That and idle chat seem more appropriate in Kibitzer's Cafe. (Why does that sound familiar?)
Premium Chessgames Member
  plang: No modern player of the Pirc would play 8..e6? (or 7..Nc6?! either) - still a nice attack by Marshall.
Dec-18-17  The Kings Domain: Sterling attack by Marshall and a neat finish, more so considering who he vanquished.
Dec-18-17  Granny O Doul: Sorry I'm late, but I see nothing wrong in onedog's sentence on this page. I do agree the old example could have been better punctuated. It is quite a bold dare to volunteer one's whole history of kibitzes to grammatical and orthographical scrutiny.

As for this game, Black's ...Nc6 looks too committal. Were it part of a plan to pressure White's center with ...Bg4 or to hunt down White's light bishop with ...Nb6 and perhaps ...Na5, it would have made more sense. Castling instead looks better.

Ok, I'm only reading plang's note now. I agree with him.

Sep-20-18  RookFile: Black may already be lost after 8...e6. 7....Nc6 was inaccurate too. More natural and active is 7....Nxc3 8. bxc3 c5.
Premium Chessgames Member
  beatgiant: "Castling into it"! Instead of 17...0-0, how about 17...Bd7 18. Rf2 0-0-0 19. Raf1 <h5>, with counterplay (20. Nxf7 Nxf7 21. Rxf7 Qg5). I'm not even sure White has the advantage.
Sep-23-18  RookFile: 17....h5 is a try. Marshall had let some of his advantage slip.
Premium Chessgames Member
  HarryP: This is the only time in his career that Pillsbury played the Pirc, as far as I know. Why on earth did he play it against a tough customer like Marshall? No doubt Marshall was surprised. But after his initial moment of being surprised he proceeded to smoke Pillsbury. As we know, Pillsbury's play was very uneven in this tournament. A week after this devastating loss to Marshall, he played one of his greatest games ever when he was paired against Lasker.
Feb-25-19  zydeco: <HarryP> Pillsbury was actually a pioneer in the Pirc. He also played it at Monte Carlo 1903 - Schlechter vs Pillsbury, 1903 - and won smoothly against Schlechter, who clearly had no idea what to do in response.

I was very surprised to see these two games. Pillsbury is never mentioned in the conversation about hypermodern chess, but clearly he was thinking along those lines - looking for ways to hold back his pieces and counterattack at his convenience.

Premium Chessgames Member
  fredthebear: Harry Pillsbury won the US chess championship in 1897, and Frank Marshall won it in 1909.
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 6)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 6 OF 6 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.

NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Stages I through III of necrotic degradation
from Frank James Robbed Banks and Kings by fredthebear
Chess Miniatures, Collection XVII
by Okavango
Pirc Def: Austrian Attack (B08) 1-0 Cambridge Springs 1904
from yFredthebear's Roundhouse RUUK Manuevers I by fredthebear
21.? (Wednesday, April 2)
from POTD Pirc , Modern ,Robatsch 2 by takchess
Cambridge Springs 1904 games
by CambridgeSprings1904
two rooks for the queen by mate comes extra.
from magic mates by kevin86
Game 25
from My Fifty Years of Chess (Marshall) by fphaase
21.? (Wednesday, April 2)
from Puzzle of the Day 2014 by Phony Benoni
Cambridge Springs 1904
by JoseTigranTalFischer
Bow to Marshall...
from Collections in Idleness 6 by kishchess
Classic attack based on positional principles, then a sacrifice
from Noteworthy Games by BAJones
Pirc Def: Austrian Attack (B08) 1-0 Cambridge Springs 1904
from Fredthebear's RUUK Repo by mneuwirth
by oao2102
Game 25
from My Fifty Years of Chess (Marshall) by Qindarka
Marshall Martials
by chocobonbon
"The changing of the guard."
from Cool games of F.J. Marshall by LIFE Master AJ

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2021, Chessgames Services LLC