< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 3 OF 3 ·
Later Kibitzing> |
Feb-09-05 | | aw1988: <pater2> Whilst I am at the moment not going to check your excellent variations, I must be curious for a moment: where on earth do you see 5...Nc3? |
|
Feb-09-05
 | | patzer2: <aw1988> Oops! Thanks for the catch. I meant 5...Nc6! and not 5...Nc3. |
|
Feb-09-05 | | aw1988: Ah, that clears it up. I was thinking "BLACK now sacrifices a knight in the Muzio?". |
|
Feb-10-05 | | schnarre: <aw1988> Wouldn't that be something, eh? |
|
Feb-11-05 | | ikava: Thanks GreenDayGuy |
|
Feb-16-05 | | schnarre: <panigma> Which Guiness commercials would those be? |
|
Feb-16-05
 | | tpstar: I love those Guinness commercials:
http://www.guinness1759society.com/... |
|
Feb-16-05 | | schnarre: Thanks tpstar! |
|
Dec-07-06 | | Chicago Chess Man: If black hadn't played 16 ... Kb7, would he still have been lost after BxN+? QxB, RxQ, KxR and black is ahead in material, right? |
|
Mar-03-07 | | benba57: gambles (gambits) have given way to more precise computer-type chess. Things go in cycles-maybe they will return. I am a bit puzzled by this comment. As I understand it, and I'm not very good with the Italian language, but, I believe the origin of the English term "gambit" is an Italian word for a tricky wrestling move, so I take issue with the popular association of gambits on the chess board with gambling. Any further thoughts??? |
|
Sep-12-10 | | sevenseaman: Maroczy's game has a river like charge to it, overflowing all obstacles.
Chigorin's ..9. cxd5 is a poor move that marks the onset of all his later troubles.
I am sure Maroczy left his tempting N on d5 hoping for the bait to be taken. It helped open the 'e' column and easier for white to keep e1 covered during his attack using this column. |
|
May-28-11 | | metamorphysis: Was Maroczy's knight sacrifice on d5 sound ? I don't know, but I do know that it was this move which inspired me to think about positional sacrifices when I first chanced upon this game at 17 (he dares to play it against Chigorin, no less !). |
|
Feb-16-12
 | | Penguincw: The KGA also provides some exciting chess! |
|
May-03-12 | | chessmaster102: why was 18.Qe2 played ? |
|
May-04-12 | | Shams: <chessmaster102> Either 18.Qe2 or 18.Qf1 is forced to guard both of White's loose pieces. |
|
Jun-07-12 | | vinidivici: After sacrificed 2 knights, would have been black still could hold a draw (at least) if both sides had played maximum (e.g all moves following the strong engine)? |
|
Jun-08-12 | | vinidivici: anyone, please? |
|
Jun-08-12 | | vinidivici: nobody answer? |
|
Jun-08-12 | | vinidivici: walah walah |
|
Nov-26-12 | | chrisfalter: kingscrusher gives a nice analysis on Youtube here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_aWM... |
|
Mar-03-13 | | Eduardo Bermudez: Harmony and economy of motion for the Maroczy's pieces ! |
|
Dec-05-18 | | Whitehat1963: Perhaps the game is too well known and the position is not balanced enough, but I see a decent Wednesday puzzle after 21...f6. |
|
Jan-19-19 | | Pyrandus: Maroczy was better than
Portisch? |
|
Mar-03-19 | | Momentum Man: Nice game! I really enjoyed move 19.Bf6+!!
Capturing the bishop results in immediate checkmate, in a kind of diagonal epaulet pattern |
|
Dec-09-22
 | | GrahamClayton: Is the title a pun on the English rock group Roxy Music? |
|
 |
 |
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 3 OF 3 ·
Later Kibitzing> |