chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Emanuel Lasker vs Amos Burn
St. Petersburg (1909), St. Petersburg RUE, rd 13, Mar-04
Spanish Game: Closed Variations (C84)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 17 times; par: 100 [what's this?]

Get this game explained with Decode Chess
explore this opening
find similar games 3 more Lasker/Burn games
sac: 59.Rxe2 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: To access more information about the players (more games, favorite openings, statistics, sometimes a biography and photograph), click their highlighted names at the top of this page.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
Dec-05-05  paladin at large: Impressive sacrifice of the exchange by Lasker with 57. Rxc4 and the white d and e pawns cannot be stopped. Could Burn have equalized earlier somewhere?
Jun-10-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: This game gets annotated at some length in Soltis' Lasker book.

Burn missed a chance for strong central pressure with 12...cxd4 13. cxd4 Bg4. After move 16 Lasker had the bishop pair and no problems in the center, so he had a permanent advantage. At move 22 Lasker closes the center, moves his rooks to the kingside and pushes the h-pawn. Burn can try for counterplay with ...c4 and ...Nc5 but chooses to remain passive. Lasker prepares f4 very carefully, since it allows Black to open the bishop's diagonal and then play ...b4, breaking open the queenside. When f4 finally comes, Burn decides that playing ...exf4 will allow White to overwhelm the black King's defenses before Black can accomplish anything on the queenside.

41....c4 is the first Burn move that Soltis gives a question mark to, writing, "This move, which should have been the key to Black's counterplay earlier, is a positional blunder here. Having adopted a passive policy he should have stuck with it (41...a4 and ...Bf6-d8)."

Lasker's 42. a4! leaves Black with weaknesses all over the queenside. Burn fails to trade off Lasker's remaining knight with 43...Bxe3, and the knight takes up a very strong position on f5. Lasker then plays Bc2 and Ra1, preparing to go after the exposed pawns. After move 48, Soltis writes, "Everything is protected and White can carry out the kind of mop-up strategy, picking off Black pawns, that Lasker loved."

52. Bc6 sets up a strong threat of b4!, but Lasker decides to play to win the the c-pawn instead with Ra4.

54...exf4 and 55...f5 is a last-gasp atttempt at counterplay -- a little late. 57...Nxh5 was better than 57...Ng4, but Burn was lost in either case.

To sum up, both sides played imprecisely in the opening, but White emerged with a small but permanent advantage. Thereafter Burn defended tenaciously but passively, as Lasker probed for an opening. Having spent nearly the entire game playing on the kingside, Lasker pounced on the queenside as soon as a couple of minor Burn imprecisions gave him the chance, and soon White had an overwhelming position over the entire board. Realizing he was lost, Burn made a final bid for counterplay, but Lasker found a crushing sacrifice, and wound up winning, not on the kingside, not on the queenside, but right in the middle of the board.

I joked elsewhere that in this game White carried out every possible plan, but it's a great game, surely one of Lasker's best -- positional creativity, accurate calculation, and almost superhuman patience. Nothing for Burn to be ashamed of either.

Jun-10-06  Calli: <57...Nxh5 was better than 57...Ng4>

Lasker in the tournament book:
"If 57....KtxRP, White plays K-R2 and the Knight is in a very bad position."

I never understood this; after 57...Nxh5 58.Kh2 and the pin on the e file is still there, isn't it? Therefore, Black can return the Knight 58...Nf6. White may play the same sacrifice as the game but Black has an extra pawn.

Jun-10-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <Calli> Yes, I think you're right. Soltis gives 58...Nf6 59 Rxc5! Qxe2 60. Rxe2 dxc5 61. d6 Re6 62. Bf3 Rbe8 63. Be3 and says "White wins as in the game but not nearly as easily".
Jul-08-14  Garech: Fantastic game from Lasker.

-Garech

Dec-13-14  poorthylacine: The game is really won too after the variant of Soltis, but only a further analysis -for amateurs nowadays available by the help of a computer- can make it evident; 57...Nxh5 is more resistant than the text move however, but maybe we have to notice that the annotations of Lasker were intended to strong players: what was obvious for him is not so easy to understand for players whose name is not for instance... Alekhine!!
Oct-27-20  zenwabi: This is Game 41 in the 21st Century Edition of Nimzowitsch's MY SYSTEM (Hays Publishing).

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
56
from Why Lasker Matters by Andrew Soltis by keypusher
Round 13
from St Petersburg 1909 by Archives
56
from Why Lasker Matters by Andrew Soltis by StoppedClock
Spanish Game: Closed Var (C84) 1-0 Notes by Stockfish
from -ER Lasker by fredthebear
Treasure's Ark
by Gottschalk
Emanuel Lasker's Best Games
by KingG
Game 36 pp.264-265
from Games appearing in 'My System' by A. Nimzowitsch by Pawn N Hand
56
from Why Lasker Matters by Andrew Soltis by Incremental
Game 36
from My System (Nimzowitsch) by Okavango
56
from Why Lasker Matters by Andrew Soltis by wvb933
Game 36
from My System (Nimzowitsch) by neontheorist
Changement de direction du jeu
by timu222
Round 13
from St Petersburg 1909 by JoseTigranTalFischer
56
from Why Lasker Matters by Edwin Meijer
All Hail Emanuel
by iron maiden
Game 36
from My System (Nimzowitsch) by Qindarka
Closed Ruy Exemplars
by JamesDoyle
mi sistema de nimzovich
by LESTRADAR
Game 36
from My System (Nimzowitsch) by jgrob12
Game 36
from My System (Nimzowitsch) by isfsam
plus 6 more collections (not shown)

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2021, Chessgames Services LLC