keypusher: Part I
After a disastrous opening, Botvinnik showed cunning, patience and creativity, finally escaping to a pawn-down heavy pieces ending, which he managed to draw in 90 moves. But you can’t help but wonder: how did Botvinnik mess up the opening so badly? And why couldn’t Tal finish him off? Notes in brackets are by Smyslov; my and Shredder’s comments are in plain text. 1.e4 c6 2.d4 d5 3.e5 Bf5 4.h4 c5
<In almost every game Botvinnik finds new paths. In the previous games of the match the moves 4….h6 and 4….h5 were employed here. Now Black decides to begin counterplay on the queenside without delay. However, this plan proves inadequate and leads to opening difficulties.> 5.dxc5 Qc7
5…..e6, trying to follow 1.e4 c6 2.d4 d5 3.e5 c5 4.dxc5 e6 as played in Games 4 and 6, here loses the bishop after 6.g4. In his prematch notebook, Botvinnik gave 5….Nc6 6.Bb5 Qa5+ 7.Nc3 e6 8.g4 d4 9.Qxd4 Bxc2 10.Bd2 Qxb5 11.Nxb5 Nxd4 12.Nxd4 Be4 13.f3 Bd5 14.Nb5 Kd7 <= because of …f6.> Shredder disagrees with this evaluation, rating White a full pawn up. Perhaps Botvinnik had second thoughts, but in any case he winds up in a terrible position. . 6.Nc3
White could also try the ultra-greedy 6.Qxd5: 6….e6 7.Bb5+ Nc6 8.Bxc6+ bxc6 9.Qd4. 6…..Nc6
<Both sides are aiming for rapid development. Of course, if 6….Qxe5+, there would have followed 7.Be3 and then 8.Nf3, bringing out the pieces with gain of tempo.> Shredder slightly prefers 6….Nd7, but Black is in bad shape in any event. 7.Nf3 Rd8 8.Nb5 Qc8 9.Nfd4
<9.c3 also came into consideration, and if 9….Bg4, then 10.Qa4, or 9….a6 10.Nbd4 consolidating the material gain.> 9…..Bg4 10.f3 Bd7 11.Nxc6 bxc6 12.Nd4 Qb8 13.Qe2 e6
 click for larger view – <Necessary in view of the threat of 14.e6. Now White cannot hold his extra pawn, but with a simple maneuver he secures for himself a clear positional advantage.> 14.Nb3<!> Bxc5
<Of course, it is undesireable for Black to exchange this bishop and leave himself without a defender of the dark squares. But how else can he complete his development?> 15.Nxc5 Qb4+ 16.c3 Qxc5 17.Be3 Qa5 18.b4
<18.Qf2 Ra8 19.Qg3 was perhaps a more subtle continuation, aiming to provoke a weakening of the kingside.> 18….Qc7 19.Bc5 Ne7 20.h5 h6
 click for larger view – 21.Bd6
<It was hardly worth moving the bishop from its good position. After 21.f4 Ra8 22.Qf2 and 23.Bd3 it would have been difficult for Black to complete the mobilisation of his forces.> 21.Qb7 22.0-0-0 Ra8
<It was risky to accept the exchange sacrifice: 22….Nf5 23.Bc5 Ng3 24.Qf2 Nxh1 25.Qh4 Bc8 26.Bd3 and White gains a strong attack.> 23.g4 a5 24.Qf2 axb4 25.cxb4 c5<!>  click for larger view – <A subtle pawn sacrifice. In a difficult position Black resourcefully seeks ways of activating his game. Going into an endgame by 25…..Qa7 26.Qxa7 Rxa7 did not promise any relief in view of 27.Kb2 Bc8 28.Rc1 etc.> Of course, 25….c5 is only possible because Tal castled, led astray by the exchange sacrifice. Now most of his advantage is gone. |