Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
David Bronstein vs Mikhail Botvinnik
Botvinnik - Bronstein World Championship Match (1951), Moscow URS, rd 4, Mar-23
Slav Defense: Schlechter Variation (D15)  ·  1/2-1/2



explore this opening
find similar games 32 more Bronstein/Botvinnik games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: To flip the board (so black is on the bottom) press the "I" key on your keyboard.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.


Kibitzer's Corner
Sep-20-06  Resignation Trap: Botvinnik made a long and more detailed
entry into his journal before this game:

"So far I have discovered, or more correctly, confirmed the following deficiencies in Bronstein's play:

1) weak play in time trouble - without outright blunders (with simplification);

2) weak play in technical positions without the initiative;

3) unjustified avoidance of positions without counterplay, even at the cost of a pawn.

I have been unable to exploit the first deficiency, since I myself have been hopelessly short of time.

I have not exploited the second deficiency on account of poor analysis, time trouble and stupid haste - instead of accumulating advantages.

The third deficiency - I wrongly believed him, and he deceived me.

Hence the conclusions:

1) the main thing - time;

2) continue to play by technique (in superior positions);

3) calculate without fear - simply play chess and remember that the opponent may and should go wrong. Let's go!"

Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: Thanks for transcribing this note.

<"calculate without fear - simply play chess and remember that the opponent may and should go wrong. Let's go!">

I am reminded of Tal's comment about Botvinnik in the 1961 rematch (from memory, so this is no more than a paraphrase)

<We were unprepared for the change in Botvinnik. In this match [unlike in 1960] he went in willingly for complications if they looked favorable to him.>

More than most masters, I think, Botvinnik had to battle with his own nerves as well as his opponent across the board.

Sep-21-06  euripides: Interesting stuff. The art of simplifying when short of time without making positional concessions is an important discriminator at all levels of chess, and Botvinnik might have been in Capablanca's class at this.
Sep-21-06  Resignation Trap: Botvinnik wrote after the game:

"Played, on the whole, indifferently. Set one trap and then revelled in it for the entire game.

With time, things were initially reasonable.

Bronstein's No.3 deficiency can be amplified - 3a) unjustified avoidance of positions with counterplay for the opponent!!! (he's afraid!)."

Sep-21-06  euripides: On reflection, Botvinnik vs Bronstein, 1951 suggests that Botvinnik may not have been quite in Capablanca's class in the mastery of elegant simplification.
Oct-03-10  Everett: I've read these postings by <RT, thank you!> many times over the years, and I find it remarkable how superficial they show themselves to be. I mean, one would think that his own lack of time is precisely due to Bronstein always seeking activity, and willing to sacrifice a <pawn!> for it. Seems that Bronstein dragged Botvinnik into the world of modern chess! I imagine Botvinnik didn't thank him.
Premium Chessgames Member
  plang: 4..g6, the Schlechter-Slav is a hybrid of the Slav and the Grunfeld which is solid but offers little active counterplay for Black. 15 b4 could have been answered by 15..Qxa3 16 Ra1..Qb3 17 Rfb1..Nxd4!. 16..Rfd8 might have been an improvement maintaining control of c7. Bronstein had a clear advantage after 20..Qb8 and commented that Botvinnik could have won the position with the White pieces against any opponent starting with 21 Bc5 followed by some combination of Nb6, Bf3, a4, b5 etc. Instead 21 f4?! created weaknesses and gave Botvinnik time to defend. 31 bxc might have given White more chances.
Jun-11-13  zydeco: 15.Ra1! 19.Bc7!

It's funny that Bronstein acknowledges that 21.Bc5 was the right way -- creating a tremendous bind on the queenside -- and says that Botvinnik would have won it; which seems to mean that Bronstein felt he was temperamentally unsuited for that kind of position (even if's better) and needed to create some sort of additional imbalance.

Jun-12-13  Everett: <zydeco> that is an interesting idea you mention. Looking at this game, later in the match, we see Bronstein dancing on the weak Q-side squares to win the game.

Botvinnik vs Bronstein, 1951

So, I think Bronstein could have easily handled this position similarly. A lot of these types of positions came up in the WC games, and Bronstein proved Botvinnik's equal in less-open and more-stiff pawn structures.

Jun-12-13  madlydeeply: <The third deficiency - I wrongly believed him, and he deceived me.>

This is priceless I love it! There is always more going on than the moves on the board....

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.

NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
World Championship Game #4
from WCC Index [Botvinnik-Bronstein 1951] by Suenteus Po
94_-> Middlegames with opposite-coloured Bi~
by whiteshark
Match Botvinnik!
by amadeus
Match Bronstein!
by amadeus
Game 4, Match tied 2-2
from 1951 World Chess Championship by Penguincw
Botvinnik vs Bronstein WCM 1951
by ilcca
Match Botvinnik!
by chessgain
Match Bronstein!
by docjan
World Championship Game #4
from WCC Index [Botvinnik-Bronstein 1951] by passion4chess

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2023, Chessgames Services LLC