Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Grigory Levenfish vs Mikhail Botvinnik
Botvinnik - Levenfish (1937), Leningrad RUS, rd 7, Oct-18
Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical. Noa Variation (E34)  ·  0-1



Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 4 times; par: 67 [what's this?]

Get this game explained with Decode Chess
explore this opening
find similar games 18 more Levenfish/Botvinnik games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: If we are missing an important game, you can submit it (in PGN format) at our PGN Upload Utility.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.


Kibitzer's Corner
Aug-07-09  Knight13: A very superb use of knights, seriously.

25. Bc2 followed by f4 and White should be fine. 25. Qh5? accomplishes absolutely nothing and wastes tempo, in which Botvinnik took advantage and killed off the fish.

Jun-06-15  ToTheDeath: This belongs in a "two knights advantage" game collection.
Jun-06-15  visayanbraindoctor: <TTD: two knights advantage>

Thanks for pointing out this game. I believe it superbly demonstrates the advantage of Queen and Knight vs Queen and Bishop in endgames. Traditionally, the Bishop has been considered slightly superior to the Knight, until Capablanca pointed out in Chess Fundamentals that a <Queen and Knight> is stronger than Q and B. In this case, the advantage was magnified with Botvinnik having two Knights.

Recently I commented on Gelfand vs Carlsen, 2013 at Carlsen's fine comprehension of this principle. I think he purposefully simplified into a Q + N vs Q + B endgame, knowing he had the advantage. Most kibitzers were not aware of this chess fundamental.

As Botvinnik demonstrates, IMO a Queen plus two Knights advantage constitutes an objectively winning game, and could be treated as a decisive material advantage, such as being up by more than a pawn or being up an exchange, with other things being equal.

This is a practical kind of knowledge. Many players, automatically adhering to the <Bishop is superior to Knight> fall into the trap of allowing an endgame where their Q + B is against a Q + N. IMO it's almost like giving up a pawn for nothing.

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.

NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
The pair of bishops is not always a winning factor
from the most instructive classic games by timothee3331
Match Botvinnik!
by chessgain
Game collection: E34
by Chessdreamer
nimzo rep
by doug27
The pair of bishops is not always a winning factor
from the most instructive classic games by Atsa
The pair of bishops is not always a winning factor
from the most instructive classic games by Southernrun
Match Botvinnik!
by amadeus
The pair of bishops is not always a winning factor
from the most instructive classic games by Retarf
Game 7
from Botvinnik-Levenfish Match 1937 by suenteus po 147

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2021, Chessgames Services LLC