Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Roman Levit vs Julio Bolbochan
92nd US Open (1991), Los Angeles, CA USA, rd 5, Aug-01
Queen's Indian Defense: Classical. Traditional Variation (E17)  ·  0-1



Get this game explained with Decode Chess
explore this opening
find similar games 421 more games of Bolbochan
sac: 26...Nxg3 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: To access more information about the players (more games, favorite openings, statistics, sometimes a biography and photograph), click their highlighted names at the top of this page.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.

Kibitzer's Corner
Dec-23-10  ozmikey: I wonder if 26...Nxg3 is sound or not? Certainly leads to one of those positions where White is one small mistake away from complete disaster, so in a practical setting I suppose it's worth it!
Premium Chessgames Member
  Fusilli: <ozmikey> I agree. It's a "go fish" kind of situation. And, worst case scenario, Black has three pawns for the piece and the White king is exposed.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: I attribute the loss to Levit's youth and inexperience. He was only 67 at the time of the game; GM Julio Bolbochan was 71.
Dec-24-10  ozmikey: <Phony Benoni> Ha! Nice one.
Sep-25-13  jerseybob: ozmikey: 26..Ng3 looks sound to me, but going back just half a turn, what's wrong with 26.Nd5? And by the way, not to be chauvinistic or anything, but this and several of these 1991 games are from the U.S.Open, not Italian.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: <jerseybob> <it> is often used as an abreviation for "International Tournament" when the exact event name is not known. The actual nature of the event does not matter.
Jan-18-14  jerseybob: Phony: Then to be exact shouldn't the abbreviation read "IT", with both letters in caps? Or are all those old-fashioned "pen and paper" grammar rules out the window in webland?
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: <jerseybob> Those who first input the games into a computer may not have been English-speakers at all. Their source information probably had just "Los Angeles". The "Event" field was required in PGN, so instead of wasting time in research they simply used "it" as a default. As I recall, this was the early practice in "Informant"

Since games in databases are simply dumped from one to another with little correction, the practice persists.

Of course, it's easy for us to say they should have used some higher standards. But at the time there were no such standards, just a rush to digitize as many games as possible quickly.

Jan-20-14  jerseybob: Phony: Thanks for that, and for whatever part you play in making these games available. I'm not sitting here with a giant red pencil waiting to swoop down on mistakes. I just want to understand what I'm reading.
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: <PB: I attribute the loss to Levit's youth and inexperience. He was only 67 at the time of the game; GM Julio Bolbochan was 71.>

The result here is apparently retribution for what went in the well-known encounter D van Foreest vs J Mieses, 1949, which resulted in triumph for the 'young' player Mieses.

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.

NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Games for study
by ozmikey
Round 5 (Thursday, August 1)
from US Open 1991, Los Angeles by Phony Benoni

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2021, Chessgames Services LLC