chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Murray Chandler vs Michael Adams
Hastings (1989/90), Hastings ENG, rd 2
Scandinavian Defense: Panov Transfer (B01)  ·  0-1

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 24 times; par: 119 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 10 more Chandler/Adams games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: To flip the board (so black is on the bottom) press the "I" key on your keyboard.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Jun-09-02
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sneaky: Is this gambit sound?! It must be, because GM Adams is no slouch.

Amazing how Adams gets a superior position against White in just a few moves!! I love it.

Jun-09-02  refutor: it's not really a gambit, adams wins the pawn back with interest. 3.c4?! trying to hold on to the pawn is not the best way to meet 2. ... Nf6 in my opinion. the line i play is 3.d4 Nxd5 4.c4 gaining a tempo and opening up lines for development
Jun-11-02
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sneaky: Very interesting. Even after your 3. d4 move (clearly a more sound approach) Black still has some interesting resources. The Sicilian (my current reply to 1.e4) is very difficult to play, and I've been looking for a good 1.e4 defense, and maybe this is it. Time for some home preparation!
Jun-14-02  atripodi: how would you characterize this opening? it seems really defensive. also, i think i like the 1.e4 d5 2.exd5 Qxd5 3.nc3 Qa5 variation better
Jun-14-02
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sneaky: I've heard a good things about the dynamic 1.e4 d5 2.exd5 Qxd5 3.Nc3 Qd6 line.
Jan-03-03  GregorMendel: By move 18, Black is down materially but nevertheless owns White. All of White's pawns are isolated and/or doubled, and cannot stand.
Jan-04-03  drukenknight: why the exchange of queens here: wouldnt 7 Qe2 be the typical response if you were playing a kings gambit?
Jan-04-03  ughaibu: White also can play 4. d4 transposing to the Panov-Botvinnik Attack.
Jan-04-03  refutor: sneaky...did you ever take up the scandinavian defense? there is a very good book on the ...Qd6 variation and it is a very sharp line.
Oct-14-04  themindset: although adams definitely got the edge out of the opening due to white's dubious handling of the 2...Nf6 scandinavian, i felt that he threw it away with 14...Bc5 a move that not only creates two iso pawns, but also lets white exchange his ineffective dark-squared bishop. so i checked with crafty, and it looks like white *could* have taken the initiative with this fairly straightforward line: depth=16 1/26 +0.81
15. Bxc5 bxc5 16. Rb1 Na5 17. Ng5 Rhe8 18. Rb5 Nb7 19. Be2 a6
Oct-15-04  whithaw: Actually, 3.c4 was fine for white, probably even the best. White went wrong with 4.dc6, where 4.d4 is a much stronger move, and after black plays 4...,cd5, the position has transposed into a panov-botvinnik attack in the caro-kann. I have played the position after 4.d4 several times.

I am not sure what chandler was aiming for with 4.dc6, but I am sure that he realized that he wouldn't be able to hold the pawn.

Oct-27-04  themindset: <withaw> never occured to me that it could transpose like that... very interesting.
Jun-13-07  2021: This game was played in Hastings 1990/1991 not 1989.
Aug-21-08  zluria: Topalov showed a good way to handle this opening vs Kamsky in Topalov vs Kamsky, 2006. Kamsky was just making his comeback, and didn't have his openings down pat yet, so he was trying out some unusual stuff. Toppers ignored the gambit and played simply: 1. e4 d5 2. exd5 Nf6 3. Nf3 Nxd5 4. d4 with c4 a few moves later, and got a great game without any trouble.
Mar-01-15  saintdufus: <refutor: it's not really a gambit, adams wins the pawn back with interest.>

It's most definitely a gambit. After 4...dc Black has sacrificed a clear pawn. Maybe Black will get the pawn back (which it took Adams almost 20 moves to do), or maybe Black will transform the material minus into some other kind of plus; but it's a bona fide gambit either way, as Bronstein pointed out.

As for whether the gambit is sound, in his book *The Scandinavian* GM John Emms puts it this way:

"Black is bound to have sufficient compensation, particularly as the squares d4 and d3 are so vulnerable. As a result 4...dxc6 is witnessed only very rarely at the highest levels, and I imagine that even this game was simply an attempt by Chandler to get Adams into uncharted territory."

Mar-01-15  Retireborn: I'm sure this game was played in December 1989.

The previous month Adams had used this line to beat Judit Polgar in a rapid game at the Barbican Festival (game not present here.) Judit preferred 4.d4 cxd5 5.Nc3 e6 6.Nf3 Be7 7.cxd5 Nxd5 8.Bd3 to reach a standard QGD position.

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
KayN's favorite games
by KayN
game 70 page 125
from John Emms The Scandinavian by takking
R+N vs R+N
from Master the endgames by eXodus
Scanzinavian Opening
from From Guess the Move by Y.O.
Random interesting games
by Lutwidge
..
from 96c_The Unbearable Lightness of rook endgames 3 by whiteshark
RN --> R
from 41_R+N - TActical TAngos by whiteshark
R & N endgame: active play vs weak pawns
from Endgames by alligator
John Emms' book The Scandinavian, Game 70, p. 125
from A B C Players of Yesteryear Stan by fredthebear
Scandinavian Def: Panov Transfer 7...QxQd1 (B01) 0-1 Passers
from CCounter Puncher Popped Fredthebear by fredthebear
game 70 page 125
from John Emms The Scandinavian by takchess
2.4 14 ...b6!
from Techniques of Positional Play 45 Practical Metho by takchess
2.4 14 ...b6!
from Techniques of Positional Play 45 Practical Metho by Takchessbooks
2.4 14 ...b6!
from Techniques of Positional Play 45 Practical Metho by Del ToRo
2.4 14 ...b6!
from Techniques of Positional Play 45 Practical Metho by isfsam

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2023, Chessgames Services LLC