Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Dimitri Reinderman vs Garry Kasparov
Hoogovens Group A (1999), Wijk aan Zee NED, rd 5, Jan-21
Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation (B90)  ·  0-1



Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 10 times; par: 77 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 1 more D Reinderman/Kasparov game
sac: 25...Rxc6 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.


Kibitzer's Corner
Sep-26-02  bishop: Black had the more advanced passed pawns and better king position in the ending.
Jan-20-08  Capablanca44: A very instructive endgame! The d and e pawns made a powerful Pawn Duo that gave Black a chance to deliver a lethal blow to White. This was an excellent strategy by Kasparov because he had to plan to link up the d and e Pawns. The d and e Pawns did not even need piece protection when they reached the sixth and seventh ranks. Yet Kasparov made sure to have his King in close proximity. The significance of a Passed Pawn Duo can have a great impact in the endgame.
Jan-20-08  Capablanca44: Kasparov made sure that White`s King did not have any access to the adjacent c file. Another technique to ensure the safety of the Pawn Duo. We can really learn a lot from the expert endgame technique used in this game. Hence the placement of the Black Rook on the c file was not only to stop White`s Pawn from promoting but to protect the indomitable Pawn Duo.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Check It Out: Even in the Sicilian it's disconcerting for me to see GM's leaving their rooks open to exchange like this. The values pounded in my head as a kid make it hard for me to even consider given up a rook for a minor piece purely for positional considerations.
Sep-06-11  qqdos: <Administrator> <Not (B90) but (B89)>. This game is incorrectly classified. It is clearly a Sozin/Sicilian (by transposition) and as such was classified (B88) in Chess Informator 75/231 when it was published there, but that is also wrong. Compare it to I. Almasi vs Howell, Budapest 1994 (B89) which appears in Akopian's 1996 (89) Monograph, p.67 note 297 and p.131 [game 47]. This variation comes under the umbrella of the (B89) Velimirovic. Ditto the games given under "find similar games" above! By the way, White's 23.Rf1? is a mistake - better 23.f6!
Sep-06-11  qqdos: <perhaps Not (B89) but (B88)> All is confusion. I have tracked a few more "truly" similar games in your database, each classified as (B89). (1) Anand vs Piket, Amsterdam 1990 but not in the (B89) Monograph. Beliavsky/Mihalicisin in their 1995 (B88) Monograph give the text at p.40 note 216 and p.76 [game 55]. Chess Informator 50/70 designate it (B88); (2) Velimirovic vs Popovic, Yug-ch 1986 - same story; (3) Yakovich vs Ionov, Ussr-ch58 1991 - same story. It's time for the pundits to sort this all out!
Premium Chessgames Member
  plang: Played in round 5; the 4th of Kasparov's 7 consecutive wins in rounds 2-8. Piket had played 13..b4 against Anand at Amsterdam 1990 and Whiye had gone on to win. Kasparov's 13..e5 was new. After 15..b4! Black's attack already looked faster than Whites; perhaps 13 f5 is an improvement over Reinderman's 13 g4?! Bad for White would have been 19 f6?..b3! 20 Bxb3..a4 21 fxe..axb. 21..Qh4! was a clever way of interfering with White's attack. 22 f6?!..Bf8 23 fxg..Bxg7 would have just strengthened the position of the Black bishop. Reinderman should have retaken the exchange at move 23 or 24 as after Kasparov's 26..Rc8 the c-pawn was doomed and Kasparov was going to end up with connected passed pawns (unless 28 c3!? was tried). 32 Qd5 led to a losing endgame; Kasparov gave, as an alternative, 32 Qg2..d5 33 g6+..hxg 34 Qxg6+..Kf8 35 Rg1..Bxa3! 36 Qxg7+..Ke8 37 Qa7..Bxb2+ 38 Kxb2..Qe2+ 39 Ka3..Ra6+ which is also winning for Black. 33..g6! won control of e6 making it easy to utilize the passed pawns.

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.

NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Kasparov Wins with Black (Classical, vs GMs)
by coffee monster
Round Five, Game #33
from Wijk aan Zee Hoogovens 1999 by suenteus po 147
Play The Najdorf Sicilian
by pdion60
Clue #27
from Holiday Present Hunt Solutions: 2013 by Penguincw
Play The Najdorf Sicilian
by jakaiden
Sicilian Defense
by SpiritedReposte
Opposite side castling attack
from Games for teaching by Azzama
Play The Najdorf Sicilian
by SantGG
from 1 Sicilian Play The Najdorf Sicilian Yes by fredthebear
Play The Najdorf Sicilian - Collection by pdion6
by nakul1964
Play The Najdorf Sicilian
by ttavenner
Hoogovens Group A 1999
by Tabanus
Play The Najdorf Sicilian
by bjamin74
Opposite side castling attack
from Games for teaching by Littlejohn
Play The Najdorf Sicilian
by PrimusPilus

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2023, Chessgames Services LLC