Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Mikhail Botvinnik vs Robert James Fischer
"Analyze This" (game of the day Jan-31-2018)
Varna Olympiad Final-A (1962), Varna BUL, rd 10, Oct-07
Gruenfeld Defense: Russian. Smyslov Variation (D98)  ·  1/2-1/2



Get this game explained with Decode Chess
explore this opening
find similar games 1,182 more games of Botvinnik
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.


Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 13 OF 13 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: <WorstPlayerEver: <offramp> Tell me, how could such a game be played by 'lesser players' at the time?>

If this game had been played by say Petrosian and Korchnoi, or Geller and Smyslov, it would never have received the amount of attention it has. It is a pretty dull game, apart from 17...Qxf4.

Premium Chessgames Member
  norami: <offramp> Do you know of any games that are the reverse? Games that should get a lot of attention but don't because they were played by "lesser players".
Premium Chessgames Member
  Retireborn: <norami> Must be quite a few. This one comes to mind:-

F Parr vs G Wheatcroft, 1938

although I see that it has attracted some attention. Also games that end in draws, because the patzers like blood:-

Szabo vs Flohr, 1946

Premium Chessgames Member
  Sally Simpson: Hi Offramp,

That 'uninteresting' Fischer - Bisguier from 1963. Was that not the game where Fischer fell asleep. Looks like he did not find it interesting till Bisguier made a blunder (he woke up Fischer).

Brings a whole new meaning to the term: "I could beat you in my sleep."

Re-lesser known players and their games. When I started writing about chess in newspapers, magazines, news letters and my own magazine 40 years ago I made it my task to only use lesser players games.

They are much more instructive (and more fun to note up) than GM games.

Why study GM games and their current crop of openings when you are not going to play any. Better to see games of your peers and learn how to spot blunders.

They (we) are the bread and butter of the game. Without us to buy the books, pay club subs and entrance fees etc...etc... chess would possibly fade away.

Let them stroll in the sunshine and see their mini-masterpiece in print.

Jan-31-18  jith1207: Agree <Sally Simpson>

On another post in this page, I got a laugh at Harry Kasparov :)

Jan-31-18  Pirandellus: Hi! Who is GM Szabo?
Jan-31-18  ChessHigherCat: I don't understand why black didn't play Kf6, keeping the g pawn (which seems important for defensive purposes) and winning a tempo for advancing the connected pawns, which don't need to be supported by the king (for example, 50...Kf6, 51. Rb7 Ra5 followed by b5, a6, etc., with the black pawns hobbling forward.) White certainly can't queen his isolated pawns with the black g-pawn in the way and there are no mating threats, either.
Premium Chessgames Member
  ajk68: I let the CG Stockfish engine chew on 38...? Its recommendation is surprising! Kf6. In second place is Fischer's choice of Rd4. Re1 doesn't make the top three.

1) -1.67 (37 ply) 38...Kf6 39.Bc2 Rd4 40.Kg3 Rd2 41.f4 a5 42.h4 Ke6 43.Re3+ Kd6 44.Bb1 Rd1 45.Bc2 Rg1+ 46.Kf3 Ra1 47.a3 Rf1+ 48.Kg4 Ne6 49.Rd3+ Kc6 50.Rc3+ Kd7 51.Rd3+ Ke7 52.Bb3 h5+ 53.Kg3 Nc5 54.Re3+ Kf6 55.Bd5 Rg1+ 56.Bg2 Rd1 57.Kf3 Rd4 58.Bh3 b5 59.Bf1 b4 60.axb4 axb4 61.Re5

2) -1.62 (37 ply) 38...Rd4 39.Bc2 Kf6 40.Kg3 Rd2 41.f4 Ke6 42.Re3+ Kf7 43.Rc3 Kf6 44.h4 Re2 45.Kg4 h5+ 46.Kg3 Re1 47.Rf3 Rg1+ 48.Kh2 Rg4 49.Rg3 Rxg3 50.Kxg3 b5 51.Kf2 Ne6 52.Bd3 b4 53.Ke3 a5 54.Bc2 Ng7 55.Kd4 Nf5+ 56.Bxf5 Kxf5 57.Kc4 Kg4 58.Kb5 Kxh4 59.Kxa5 Kg3 60.Kxb4

3) -1.49 (36 ply) 38...Rb4 39.Bf3 Kf6 40.Bc6 Rb2 41.a3 Rb3 42.Re3 Rxe3 43.fxe3 Ke5 44.a4 a6 45.Kf2 Kd6 46.Be8 Kd5 47.Kf3 Ke5 48.h4 Ne4 49.Bc6 Nd6 50.Kg4 Nf5 51.h5 Nxe3+ 52.Kg5 gxh5 53.Kxh5 a5 54.Kh6 Kd4 55.Kxh7 Kc5 56.Bb5 Nf5 57.Kg6 Nd6

Premium Chessgames Member
  ajk68: After Rd4, the CG Stockfish recommends:

1) -1.69 (38 ply) 39.Bf3 h5 40.Re3 Kf6 41.Be2 h4 42.a3 g5 43.Kf3 Rd2 44.Re8 Ra2 45.Re3 Rc2 46.Kg2 Ne6 47.Bg4 Nf4+ 48.Kf3 Rc4 49.Bd7 Rc1 50.Bg4 Rc2 51.Rb3 Nd5 52.Rd3 Ke5 53.Bh5 Rc1 54.Bg4 Rc4 55.Rb3 Kd6 56.Ke2 Rc2+ 57.Kf3 Kc5 58.Bf5 Ra2 59.Bg4 Kc4 60.Be6 Kxb3

2) -1.74 (38 ply) 39.Bc2 Kf6 40.a3 a5 41.Bb3 Rf4 42.f3 Ke5 43.Bg8 h5 44.Rc2 h4 45.Rb2 Rf8 46.Bc4 Kd4 47.Rc2 g5 48.Bb5 Ne6 49.Bf1 Nf4+ 50.Kf2 Rf5 51.a4 Rc5 52.Rd2+ Kc3 53.Rd6 Kb4 54.Rxb6+ Kxa4 55.Ke3 Ka3 56.Ke4 a4 57.Rb8 Rc3 58.Rb5 Ne6 59.Ke5

3) -1.94 (37 ply) 39.Rc1 h5 40.Be2 Rd2 41.Bc4 Ne4 42.Rf1 Kf6 43.a4 Nc5 44.Ra1 Rd4 45.Bb5 a6 46.Bc6 a5 47.Rb1 Rb4 48.Rd1 Nxa4 49.Bxa4 Rxa4 50.Rd6+ Kf5 51.Rxb6 Ra1 52.Kf3 a4 53.Rb5+ Ke6 54.Rb6+ Kd5 55.Rxg6 a3 56.Ra6 Kc4 57.Ke2 a2 58.Ra8 Kb3 59.Rb8+ Ka3 60.Ra8+ Kb2 61.Rb8+ Kc3 62.Ra8

Premium Chessgames Member
  ajk68: Stockfish evaluates 38...Re1 as:

1) -1.44 (37 ply) 39.Bf3 Rb1 40.Bc6 Rd1 41.Re3 Rd6 42.Bb5 a6 43.Be2 Kf6 44.Bc4 Rd2 45.Rf3+ Kg5 46.Rg3+ Kh5 47.Bg8 Kh6 48.Rf3 Kg7 49.Bc4 Rd4 50.Bb3 Kh6 51.Re3 a5 52.Bf7 Kg5 53.Rg3+ Kf6 54.Rf3+ Ke5 55.Re3+ Kd6 56.Bg8 h6 57.Rf3 Ke5 58.Rf8 Nd3 59.Kf3 b5 60.Re8+ Kf5

Feb-26-18  pdxjjb: After Fischer's mistake and the exchange on move 42, SF9 thinks 43 Rc7 is the only strong move for Botvinnik, and 43 Ra3 was a serious mistake.

At significant depth (39+ ply on branches and much deeper on some), SF rates Rc7 as -0.4 (small advantage for Fischer) and Ra3 as -2.0, and as the analysis depth increases, it likes Rc7 less and less.

SF says the game might have continued e.g. 43. Ra3 a5 44. Rd3 Rb4 45. h4+ Kf5 46. Rf3+ Ke6 47. Re3+ Kd6 48. Rd3+ Ke5 49. a3 Rb2 50. Rd7 Rb3+ 51. Kg4 Rxa3 52. Rb7 Rb3 53. Rxh7 ...

Feb-27-18  pdxjjb: ^^^ OK, I see the computer annotated score has this variation.
Feb-27-18  Charlie Durman: <RookFile> is on the money .

I find myself agreeing with most of his posts.

Fischer , the teenage Fischer, was surpassing the ageing tired Botvinnik by this game ..

Botvinnik being propped up by Geller and the rest of the Soviet School of Chess. lol

Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: < Charlie Durman: <RookFile> is on the money . I find myself agreeing with most of his posts.

Fischer , the teenage Fischer, was surpassing the ageing tired Botvinnik by this game ..

Botvinnik being propped up by Geller and the rest of the Soviet School of Chess. lol>

No matter what you call yourself, you'll always be Harry Lime, International Spammaster.

Jan-29-20  Petrosianic: Bizarro Comment of the Day, in an article about this game:

<Fischer and Botvinnik have pretty much slipped into obscurity as the chess world moves on and the chess understanding of today's top players has surpassed theirs, but at Varna in 1962, one of the most looked forward to games was the World Champion Botvinnik against the hopeful Fischer.>

Anyone who thinks that non-recent World Champions have slipped into obscurity must not be very much into chess.

Premium Chessgames Member
  Sally Simpson: ***

I agree Petrosianic it is rather odd, especially with Fischer and the fact an english translation of the 2015 book: 'Bobby Fischer, The Final Years' was recently published.

C.N. 11654

Edward Winter adds:

"Among the many dozens of volumes about Fischer, Sverrisson’s exceptionally informative and gripping work stands out, and for as long as interest in Fischer endures, it will be avidly read and quoted."

But the linked lad is just a casual chess blogger and therefore totally sane, not chess daft like you, me and a load of others here.

He missed out the best bit when these two met. 'The Three Words' it is bloggers gold dust.

"Botvinnik told me: "Fischer has only spoken three words to me in his life. When we were introduced, he pointed to himself and said 'Fischer'. When we sat down to play here, we bumped heads and he said 'Sorry'. At the end of the game, he said 'Draw'."


Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: <Petrosianic>, that bit of strangeness coming, moreover, from a blogger who styles himself with the portmanteau 'Tartajubow'.
Jan-30-20  Petrosianic: <perfidious>: I wonder if he imagines that nobody could imagine where that name comes from? If world champions are obscure, even older players who were never champion must be even more so. In fact, I'll bet that most posters here would have no trouble deciphering that name.
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: <Petrosianic: <perfidious>: I wonder if he imagines that nobody could imagine where that name comes from? If world champions are obscure, even older players who were never champion must be even more so. In fact, I'll bet that most posters here would have no trouble deciphering that name.>

It is a cross between <Petrosian> and <Ossianic> (Scots-Gaelic).

Jan-30-20  Petrosianic: <offramp> <It is a cross between <Petrosian> and <Ossianic> (Scots-Gaelic).>

Not mine, we're talking about the name "Tartajubow". I'll bet that wouldn't vex you for a second.

Mine is actually based on annotators who frequently use the phrase "Petrosianic maneuvering" in describing a long protracted series of maneuvers. So, in that context "Petrosianic" means "Like Petrosian".

Your interpretation might be better than mine, though. Since the family does come from Scotland, I probably should have thought of that myself.

Premium Chessgames Member
  Sally Simpson: ***

Actually my post is a bit irrelevant because I've just noticed the lad posted this on Boxing Day 2016!

Sorry, I thought this was a recent observation by Petrosianic. (who is to blame for this uncharacteristic error by me.)

Perhaps back in 2016 Fischer and Botvinnik had slipped into obscurity and are only now making a comeback.

Dec-07-20  Justin796: Isn't there a cool photo out there of Fischer and Botvinnik at the conclusion of this game showing Fischer's frustration and Botvinnik's delight lol.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Joshka: <Justin796> There is a 25 second clip on you tube somewhere...just type in their names and it should pull up. It's a very raw, no audio clip, mostly of the smiling Botvinnik who was happy with the draw;-)
Jan-23-21  Ancalagon: Curious about modern engine evaluation of Fischer's proposed 51...Kd4, after Rxg8 Stockfish 12 (Depth 47/99) evaluates the position as completely drawn:

1) 0.0 52... Rh1 53. Rg4+ Kc5 54. Kg2 Re1 55. Rg5+ Kc4 56. Rg4+ Kb3 57. Rg3+ Ka4 58. Rg4+

2) 0.0 52... b5 53. h5 b4 54. h6 Rh1 55. Kg2 Rh5 56. Ra6 b3 57. Rxa7 Rxh6 58. Rb7

3) 0.0 52... Re1 53. h5 b5 54. h6 a5 55. Rg4+ Kc3 56. Rg5 b4 57. Rxa5 Rh1 58. Ra6

May-03-21  gary11201: Some may find that the game is not very interesting, but the account of it in My 60 Memorable Games is fascinating because it includes both Botvinnik and Fischer's annotations.
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 13)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 13 OF 13 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.

NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Botvinnik's "Half a Century of Chess" (Pergamon 1984)
from Short games by masters by Southernrun
Game 39
from My Sixty Memorable Games (Fischer) by Okavango
Russian System 5.Qb3
from mapearson1990's Gruenfeld games by mapearson1990
Game 38
from Bobby Fischer Rediscovered (Andy Soltis) by demirchess
by Gottschalk
from 96c_The Unbearable Lightness of rook endgames 3 by whiteshark
Game 74
from 150 Chess Endings by suenteus po 147
Additional analysis at:
from Games I'll look at later by littlefermat
Game 38
from book: Bobby Fischer Rediscovered (Andy Soltis) by Baby Hawk
by notyetagm
= Kasparov v Fischer (corr)...?!
from Gazza's Greats by AdrianP
The Greatest Ever Chess Endgames
by brucemubayiwa
Game 77
from On My Great Predecessors 2 (Kasparov) by igiene
The confrontation
from My 60 Memorable Games/Fischer by Krebstar
botvinnik was lucky to draw with bobby
from best bobby's games by abstract
Game 19
from Botvinnik: Move by Move by smarticecream
Game 563
from Max Euwe - From Steinitz to Fischer, Part 2 by Okavango
martineden's favorite games
by martineden
Mikhail Botvinnik
by blues66
Game 225
from number 3 by Frodo7
plus 147 more collections (not shown)

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2021, Chessgames Services LLC