chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Chessgames premium membership fee will increase to $39 per year effective June 15, 2023. Enroll Now!

🏆
TOURNAMENT STANDINGS
Montpellier Candidates Tournament

Artur Yusupov9/15(+4 -1 =10)[games]
Rafael Vaganian9/15(+5 -2 =8)[games]
Andrei Sokolov9/15(+5 -2 =8)[games]
Jan Timman8.5/15(+4 -2 =9)[games]
Mikhail Tal8.5/15(+3 -1 =11)[games]
Boris Spassky8/15(+4 -3 =8)[games]
Alexander G Beliavsky8/15(+2 -1 =12)[games]
Vasily Smyslov7.5/15(+2 -2 =11)[games]
Alexander Chernin7.5/15(+1 -1 =13)[games]
Yasser Seirawan7/15(+2 -3 =10)[games]
Nigel Short7/15(+2 -3 =10)[games]
Lajos Portisch7/15(+3 -4 =8)[games]
Viktor Korchnoi6.5/15(+2 -4 =9)[games]
Zoltan Ribli6.5/15(+2 -4 =9)[games]
Jesus Nogueiras6/15(+2 -5 =8)[games]
Kevin Spraggett5/15(+2 -7 =6)[games]
*

Chessgames.com Chess Event Description
Montpellier Candidates (1985)

The purpose of this event was to select a challenger for the winner of the Karpov - Kasparov World Championship Match (1985) - or as it turned out, because of the rematch conditions announced in July 1985, the winner of the Kasparov - Karpov World Championship Rematch (1986). If Anatoly Karpov won the WC match (in 1985), three players would advance and be joined by Garry Kasparov in two Candidates semifinal matches. If Kasparov won the WC match, four players would advance, to play for the right to meet the WC rematch loser (whether Kasparov or Karpov) in a Candidates match. (1, 2, 3) During the event on this page (after Round 3), Kasparov was leading the WC match but the outcome was not decided.

Twelve of the players had qualified from Interzonals: Yusupov, Beliavsky, Portisch and Chernin from the Tunis Interzonal (1985), Timman, Nogueiras, Tal and Spraggett from the Taxco Interzonal (1985), and Vaganian, Sokolov, Seirawan and Short from Biel Interzonal (1985). Chernin had qualified via the Moscow Interzonal Playoff (1985), and Short via the Biel Interzonal Playoff (1985). Smyslov, Korchnoi and Ribli had qualified by reaching the Candidates semifinal matches in 1983, and Spassky was chosen by FIDE. The fight amongst the 16 players took place in the French city of Montpellier from the 12th of October to the 3rd of November. It was a Category XIV event with an average FIDE Elo rating of 2592. (4) Adjourned games were played on the 15th (Rounds 1-3), 19th (4-6), 24th (7-9) and 28th of October (10-12). Chief organizer was Jean Py (5) and the Cercle d'Echecs Alekhine de Montpellier. (6, 7) The playing venue was the Salle des Rencontres (8) at Mairie du Polygone. (5, 7) Play started 3 pm. (6) The total budget was one million francs (nearly £100,000) which also financed side events. The players were billeted in the Sofitel hotel. (9)

Photos: http://tournoidescandidatsmontpelli...

No event of this kind had been held before in France, (7) but the organisation was well received. The coastal location and very good weather were also a source of pleasure. Around the building there were computerised displays showing the current game positions, and unlike the main hall demo boards, these would flag up an error when the operators tried to enter illegal moves. One aspect of the tournament did give John Nunn (Short's second) cause for concern. The £31,000 prize fund had been split over just eight places, meaning that eight of the world’s finest players would spend a month (not counting pre-tournament preparation) working solidly for no return. (10) Most pundits favoured the chances of Timman and Beliavsky; perhaps a safe option given their Elo ratings. There was little variation in ratings generally and opinion was divided on who else might qualify. As the event unfolded, there were constant changes in the leading group and at the conclusion, matters were influenced by a number of upsets. (10) No player went undefeated, and even Spraggett, who finished last, won two games. In the end, three Soviet players advanced, whilst Tal and Timman tied for fourth place.

Montpellier, France, 12 October - 2 November 1985

Age Elo* 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Pts S-B# =1 GM Yusupov 25 2600 * 0 1 ½ ½ 1 ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ 1 1 ½ 9 65.75 =1 GM Vaganian 33 2625 1 * ½ 0 ½ 0 ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ 1 1 ½ 1 1 9 64.00 =1 GM Sokolov 22 2555 0 ½ * ½ ½ 0 ½ 1 ½ ½ ½ 1 1 1 ½ 1 9 63.25 =4 GM Timman 33 2640 ½ 1 ½ * ½ 1 ½ ½ ½ 1 1 0 ½ ½ ½ 0 8½ 65.25 =4 GM Tal 48 2565 ½ ½ ½ ½ * ½ ½ ½ 1 0 ½ ½ 1 1 ½ ½ 8½ 62.50 =6 GM Spassky 48 2590 0 1 1 0 ½ * ½ ½ ½ 1 ½ ½ ½ ½ 1 0 8 60.25 =6 GM Beliavsky 31 2640 ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ * 0 ½ ½ 1 ½ ½ ½ ½ 1 8 58.25 =8 GM Smyslov 64 2595 ½ ½ 0 ½ ½ ½ 1 * ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ 0 1 7½ 55.25 =8 GM Chernin 25 2560 ½ ½ ½ ½ 0 ½ ½ ½ * ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ 1 7½ 54.50 =10 GM Seirawan 25 2570 ½ ½ ½ 0 1 0 ½ ½ ½ * 1 ½ 0 ½ ½ ½ 7 52.75 =10 GM Short 20 2575 ½ ½ ½ 0 ½ ½ 0 ½ ½ 0 * 1 ½ 1 ½ ½ 7 51.50 =10 GM Portisch 48 2625 ½ 0 0 1 ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ 0 * 1 0 ½ 1 7 50.75 =13 GM Korchnoi 54 2630 ½ 0 0 ½ 0 ½ ½ ½ ½ 1 ½ 0 * ½ 1 ½ 6½ 46.50 =13 GM Ribli 34 2605 0 ½ 0 ½ 0 ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ 0 1 ½ * 1 ½ 6½ 46.50 15 GM Nogueiras 26 2555 0 0 ½ ½ ½ 0 ½ 1 ½ ½ ½ ½ 0 0 * 1 6 16 GM Spraggett 31 2550 ½ 0 0 1 ½ 1 0 0 0 ½ ½ 0 ½ ½ 0 * 5

Besides the main event there was a Mediterranean Open, won by Maxim Dlugy (6½ points) ahead of Rini Kuijf (6) and Juergen Marschner (6), a World Open, won by Paul van der Sterren and Yacov Isaakovich Murey (8 points), and a "semi-rapid" event, won by Krunoslav Hulak. (4)

Tal and Timman’s six-game playoff, to resolve their joint 4th place, had been planned for 6 November, but was deferred until early December to allow Tal to compete at the World Team Championship that started 16 November. This was not ideal for Timman, who was committed to his annual televised exhibition match in Hilversum, scheduled for December. (11) Another concern was that Karpov had won Game 22 on 5 November in the World Championship match in Moscow and was trailing by only one point with two games to go. There was a risk that Karpov would keep the title and that the playoff would be for a reserve spot only. Kasparov did become the new World Champion (on 9 November), but Tal and Timman had then left the venue. They returned a month later, for the

Montpellier Candidates Playoff (1985) (2-8 December):

1 Timman 2640 ½ 1 ½ ½ 0 ½ 3 2 Tal 2565 ½ 0 ½ ½ 1 ½ 3

Timman had more wins than Tal in the main tournament, and advanced, together with Yusupov, Vaganian and Sokolov, to the Candidates matches:

Sokolov - Vaganian Candidates Semifinal (1986)
Yusupov - Timman Candidates Semifinal (1986)

There is a tournament book, information about which can be found at http://books.google.no/books/about/... The main source for this collection is the booklet Candidates, Montpellier 12/10-3/11-1985, published by Robert Wade (28 pp.).

Notes

(1) Tidskrift för Schack, June-July 1985, p. 168.
(2) Tidskrift för Schack, August 1985, p. 208.
(3) Tidskrift för Schack, November 1985, p. 323.
(4) Jaque 185, pp. 616-635 (http://www.bartelski.pl/olimpbase/l...).
(5) Official website: http://tournoidescandidatsmontpelli....
(6) Montpellier Notre Ville, September 1985, p. 11.
(7) FIDE video at http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xh....
(8) Named Salle Jules Pagezy in 2015 (and still used for chess): http://ladiagonaledusud.free.fr/fre....
(9) Lev Alburt in CHESS, January 1986, pp. 297-298.
(10) John Nunn in British Chess Magazine, January 1986, pp. 2-17.
(11) British Chess Magazine, December 1985, p. 535 — the match Kasparov - Timman (1985).

*FIDE Rating List July 1985 (http://www.olimpbase.org/Elo/Elo198...).
#Sonneborn-Berger scores from Mark Weeks at http://www.mark-weeks.com/chess/858....

Original collection: Game Collection: Montpellier Candidates 1985 by User: Benzol. Thanks to <TheFocus>, <Tabanus>, and <thomastonk> for their help to make this collection possible, and to <Paint My Dragon> for information from the British Chess Magazine.

 page 1 of 5; games 1-25 of 120  PGN Download
Game  ResultMoves YearEvent/LocaleOpening
1. Beliavsky vs Korchnoi  ½-½351985Montpellier CandidatesB17 Caro-Kann, Steinitz Variation
2. Seirawan vs Portisch  ½-½181985Montpellier CandidatesE12 Queen's Indian
3. Short vs Spassky ½-½571985Montpellier CandidatesC95 Ruy Lopez, Closed, Breyer
4. Smyslov vs Timman ½-½491985Montpellier CandidatesE12 Queen's Indian
5. K Spraggett vs Yusupov  ½-½341985Montpellier CandidatesD14 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav, Exchange Variation
6. J Nogueiras vs Tal  ½-½251985Montpellier CandidatesE00 Queen's Pawn Game
7. A Sokolov vs Vaganian ½-½421985Montpellier CandidatesC09 French, Tarrasch, Open Variation, Main line
8. Chernin vs Ribli  ½-½151985Montpellier CandidatesD18 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav, Dutch
9. Korchnoi vs Short  ½-½431985Montpellier CandidatesA15 English
10. Portisch vs Spassky  ½-½641985Montpellier CandidatesE17 Queen's Indian
11. Vaganian vs Smyslov ½-½721985Montpellier CandidatesD52 Queen's Gambit Declined
12. Seirawan vs K Spraggett  ½-½261985Montpellier CandidatesA95 Dutch, Stonewall
13. Tal vs A Sokolov  ½-½151985Montpellier CandidatesD32 Queen's Gambit Declined, Tarrasch
14. Timman vs Chernin ½-½421985Montpellier CandidatesC11 French
15. Ribli vs Beliavsky ½-½741985Montpellier CandidatesD58 Queen's Gambit Declined, Tartakower (Makagonov-Bondarevsky) Syst
16. Yusupov vs J Nogueiras 1-0201985Montpellier CandidatesD43 Queen's Gambit Declined Semi-Slav
17. Spassky vs Korchnoi  ½-½151985Montpellier CandidatesA07 King's Indian Attack
18. K Spraggett vs Portisch  0-1401985Montpellier CandidatesE12 Queen's Indian
19. Short vs Ribli  1-0391985Montpellier CandidatesB80 Sicilian, Scheveningen
20. Smyslov vs Tal  ½-½241985Montpellier CandidatesE10 Queen's Pawn Game
21. Beliavsky vs Timman  ½-½321985Montpellier CandidatesB81 Sicilian, Scheveningen, Keres Attack
22. Chernin vs Vaganian  ½-½141985Montpellier CandidatesA14 English
23. J Nogueiras vs Seirawan  ½-½331985Montpellier CandidatesD26 Queen's Gambit Accepted
24. A Sokolov vs Yusupov 0-1851985Montpellier CandidatesC80 Ruy Lopez, Open
25. Portisch vs Korchnoi 1-0291985Montpellier CandidatesE12 Queen's Indian
 page 1 of 5; games 1-25 of 120  PGN Download
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2)  

Kibitzer's Corner
May-08-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: The winner ended up with +3 (+4 -1 =10). Weak or what?
Jun-06-16  Howard: Both of these players needed to win this last-round game in order to have any chance of making the "final four" but it didn't happen here.

However, British Chess Magazine stated that Spassky missed a win just before adjournment. Any idea where it was ?

Jun-06-16  Retireborn: <Howard> Assuming you're referring to the Spassky-Beliavsky game, it was apparently the sealed move 41.c4 which cost the win. The alternative 41.b4 would have kept winning chances.
Jun-10-16  Howard: Oops ! I posted that comment in the WRONG place. You're right---it was the Spassky-Belivasky game I was referring to.

Jeez !!!!!

Jun-10-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  plang: <offramp: The winner ended up with +3 (+4 -1 =10). Weak or what?>

Not sure what you mean by weak. Couldn't it just mean that the field was well-balanced?

Jun-10-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: World Chess Championship Candidates (2014), another event with no outsiders, featured a winning score of +3 =11, a full point clear of second.
Jun-13-16  Howard: Perhaps one reason why a score of +3 was good enough for a three-way tie for first place, was that most of the top players were probably just jockeying for a spot in the top four, rather than trying to win the tournament outright.

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific tournament only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!

Copyright 2001-2023, Chessgames Services LLC