page 1 of 4; games 1-25 of 91 |
     |
 |
Game |
| Result | Moves |
Year | Event/Locale | Opening |
1. Vachier-Lagrave vs H Wang |
  | ½-½ | 37 | 2011 | Tata Steel Group A | D18 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav, Dutch |
2. Nakamura vs Grischuk |
  | 1-0 | 42 | 2011 | Tata Steel Group A | D38 Queen's Gambit Declined, Ragozin Variation |
3. Nepomniachtchi vs Kramnik |
 | ½-½ | 36 | 2011 | Tata Steel Group A | C45 Scotch Game |
4. Ponomariov vs Anand |
  | 0-1 | 52 | 2011 | Tata Steel Group A | B92 Sicilian, Najdorf, Opocensky Variation |
5. L'Ami vs Giri |
 | ½-½ | 58 | 2011 | Tata Steel Group A | D16 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav |
6. Carlsen vs Aronian |
 | ½-½ | 28 | 2011 | Tata Steel Group A | C45 Scotch Game |
7. Smeets vs Shirov |
 | 1-0 | 25 | 2011 | Tata Steel Group A | C78 Ruy Lopez |
8. Giri vs Smeets |
 | ½-½ | 38 | 2011 | Tata Steel Group A | D44 Queen's Gambit Declined Semi-Slav |
9. H Wang vs Nepomniachtchi |
 | 0-1 | 80 | 2011 | Tata Steel Group A | D70 Neo-Grunfeld Defense |
10. Anand vs Kramnik |
 | ½-½ | 23 | 2011 | Tata Steel Group A | E32 Nimzo-Indian, Classical |
11. Aronian vs Nakamura |
 | ½-½ | 17 | 2011 | Tata Steel Group A | A89 Dutch, Leningrad, Main Variation with Nc6 |
12. Shirov vs Carlsen |
 | ½-½ | 28 | 2011 | Tata Steel Group A | C45 Scotch Game |
13. Grischuk vs Vachier-Lagrave |
 | ½-½ | 27 | 2011 | Tata Steel Group A | B30 Sicilian |
14. Ponomariov vs L'Ami |
 | ½-½ | 21 | 2011 | Tata Steel Group A | E59 Nimzo-Indian, 4.e3, Main line |
15. Vachier-Lagrave vs Aronian |
 | ½-½ | 21 | 2011 | Tata Steel Group A | D39 Queen's Gambit Declined, Ragozin, Vienna Variation |
16. Kramnik vs H Wang |
 | ½-½ | 46 | 2011 | Tata Steel Group A | E25 Nimzo-Indian, Samisch |
17. L'Ami vs Anand |
 | ½-½ | 31 | 2011 | Tata Steel Group A | E11 Bogo-Indian Defense |
18. Smeets vs Ponomariov |
 | 0-1 | 40 | 2011 | Tata Steel Group A | C18 French, Winawer |
19. Nepomniachtchi vs Grischuk |
 | ½-½ | 23 | 2011 | Tata Steel Group A | B90 Sicilian, Najdorf |
20. Carlsen vs Giri |
  | 0-1 | 22 | 2011 | Tata Steel Group A | D71 Neo-Grunfeld |
21. Nakamura vs Shirov |
  | 1-0 | 93 | 2011 | Tata Steel Group A | C78 Ruy Lopez |
22. Aronian vs Nepomniachtchi |
 | 1-0 | 26 | 2011 | Tata Steel Group A | D83 Grunfeld, Grunfeld Gambit |
23. Ponomariov vs Carlsen |
 | ½-½ | 32 | 2011 | Tata Steel Group A | A15 English |
24. Grischuk vs Kramnik |
 | ½-½ | 34 | 2011 | Tata Steel Group A | A09 Reti Opening |
25. Shirov vs Vachier-Lagrave |
 | 0-1 | 32 | 2011 | Tata Steel Group A | D86 Grunfeld, Exchange |
 |
page 1 of 4; games 1-25 of 91 |
     |
|
|
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 121 OF 121 ·
Later Kibitzing> |
Feb-01-11 | | Udayan Chawdhary: Hello, I am from India, the land of Anand. I wish to say that when one is young like Carsen and Nakamura, one tends to be agressive and flamboyant without a care in the world. When a man approaches 40 and thereafter, one becomes conservative in his approach, as is happening with Anand. It's a natural phenomenon. |
|
Feb-01-11 | | anandrulez: Lol @ Land of Anand :) Its a new usage . What Udayan mentioned is correct , exuberance of youth and maturity of a wise player . |
|
Feb-01-11
 | | theagenbiteofinwit: <Isn't Anand fed up with his lack-lustre tournament performance and missed wins against lower ranked players?> I'm sure he goes home after every tournament, cries, then wipes his tears with his championship wreath. |
|
Feb-01-11
 | | chancho: <I'm sure he goes home after every tournament, cries, then wipes his tears with his championship wreath.> lol |
|
Feb-01-11 | | SetNoEscapeOn: Or the Euros. |
|
Feb-02-11 | | Texas Skybear: Udayan. Are you saying one has to be conservative in his approach to be a world champ? I haven't seen a teenager reach the top either. |
|
Feb-02-11 | | DAVI DE RAFE: texas skybear, u have to be agressive to become world champion. once u reach there, be conservative and assertive.thats wat anand done. |
|
Feb-02-11 | | Udayan Chawdhary: Real World champs in any field have a healthy blend of being aggressive and being conservative. Anand is one of them. In India, we have litle sports icons as compared to other countries. Hence being an Indian, it is quite natural to be proud of Anand's accomplishments. Garry Kasparov who is universally accepted as the greatest of them all had a healthy blend of both. Even his agression had a conservatism blend and not recklesness as is the case with other youth icons. Your comments please. |
|
Feb-02-11 | | iamsheaf: If any of you have noticed. Anand doesn't usually "over-perform" or "under-perform" by a huge margin. I don't remember Anand performing at 2900+ in a very long time. Perhaps in Mexico 2007 he had that kind of performance. On the other hand Anand very rarely performs at 2700 level either. I can think of only 3 occassions in last 14 years when he did quite bad. 2001 dortmund, 2006 Olympiad and Bilbao 2008. Otherwise his performance is usually consistent, between 2760 to 2840 range.. |
|
Feb-02-11 | | TheMacMan: this is anand after his draw with Nepo, putting him in 2nd place! he was MAAADDDD!!!!
http://chessbase.com/news/2011/wijk... |
|
Feb-02-11
 | | plang: <* Anand hasn't won a super-tournament since Linares 2008; Of course these two players are, really, really great but in term of "winner of a super tournament", even if they are indeed high favourite, they are not the best in term of results as tournaments winner lately.> I continue to be amazed at the "disappointment" with Anand's results. Since 1997 he has won the World Championship in a tournament, in a match as well as defended his title in a match. He is the undisputed World Champion - he shouldn't have to prove anything to anyone. |
|
Feb-02-11 | | Winsome Knight: I feel that the way Anand trained himself for WC matches has made him more solid in his play. Of course, if he finds inaccuracies from his opponents he is pressing for a win or else he is finding it difficult to create winning positions. It is also true that opponents will be extra careful with Anand and will be happy to get a draw against him. I think only Magnus tries to play and presses for a win against Anand without compromising just for a draw. There is nothing wrong with Anand but it is just his approach that has changed after becoming world champion. And still he had come very close to winning a couple of tournaments! May be he will win one or two tournaments this year. |
|
Feb-02-11 | | montree: <iamsheaf> Exactly. I agree. Anand always maintain a class. Nowadays he is playing more like 'Capablanca' style (not losing to any lesser player, draws don't hurt). I think people should be OK with that. World Champions should not be losing often. |
|
Feb-02-11
 | | Penguincw: Just in case anyone's wondering here are the TPR (tournament performance rating): Nakamura : 2880
Anand : 2844
Carlsen : 2821
Aronian : 2821
Kramnik : 2793
Vachier-Lagrave : 2798
Giri : 2744
Ponomariov : 2739
Nepomniachtchi : 2711
Hao : 2711
Grischuk : 2627
l'Ami : 2638
Smeets : 2635
Shirov : 2600 |
|
Feb-02-11 | | polarmis: I've translated some of the highlights of Russian journalist Yury Vasiliev's reports from the tournament. Highlights include Grischuk's summary of his tournament (plus Kramnik's and Nepo's) and e.g. Kramnik revealing what he missed against Carlsen (what we all assumed!). Here: http://www.chessintranslation.com/2... And not on topic, but 3 hours left to ask Levon Aronian a question :) http://www.chessintranslation.com/2... |
|
Feb-02-11 | | vanytchouck: <plang:
<* Anand hasn't won a super-tournament since Linares 2008;
Of course these two players are, really, really great but in term of "winner of a super tournament", even if they are indeed high favourite, they are not the best in term of results as tournaments winner lately.> I continue to be amazed at the "disappointment" with Anand's results. Since 1997 he has won the World Championship in a tournament, in a match as well as defended his title in a match. He is the undisputed World Champion - he shouldn't have to prove anything to anyone.> Yeah! So true !
What's a pity, people didn't tell Kasparov it was useless to win tournaments during his reign ... Oh wait ! It was just great to see a world champion eager to show at each very tournament, at each very game that he's the undisputed #1. And i just don't miss the Petrosian'times. |
|
Feb-02-11
 | | plang: What's a pity, people didn't tell <Kasparov it was useless to win tournaments during his reign ... Oh wait ! It was just great to see a world champion eager to show at each very tournament, at each very game that he's the undisputed #1.> Kasparov's tournament record is amazing - expecting other players to match it seems unfair. |
|
Feb-02-11 | | DAVI DE RAFE: kasparov no longer in field,
karpov humiliating himself nowadays
then no one to question anand yet.
that person may not yet born |
|
Feb-02-11 | | AuN1: < polarmis: I've translated some of the highlights of Russian journalist Yury Vasiliev's reports from the tournament. Highlights include Grischuk's summary of his tournament (plus Kramnik's and Nepo's) and e.g. Kramnik revealing what he missed against Carlsen (what we all assumed!). Here: http://www.chessintranslation.com/2...
And not on topic, but 3 hours left to ask Levon Aronian a question :) http://www.chessintranslation.com/2...; there was an extremely interesting comment at the end by ilya nyzhnyk where he stated that he would prefer to play for another country, as opposed to his native ukraine. maybe he is thinking about a karjakin type transfer. |
|
Feb-06-11 | | ajile: <theagenbiteofinwit: <Isn't Anand fed up with his lack-lustre tournament performance and missed wins against lower ranked players?>
I'm sure he goes home after every tournament, cries, then wipes his tears with his championship wreath.> lol
win |
|
Mar-10-11 | | Maatalkko: What/when is the next big event, not counting the Candidates? (Obviously a doubleplusbig event.) The calendar is so dead this year. |
|
Jun-03-12 | | Open Defence: Viswanathan Anand clear second
8.5/13 (+4 -0 =9)
is a lacklustre performance??? |
|
Aug-03-14 | | whiteshark: Quote of the Day
<" I was sort of jumping up and down around the room. I was so happy. Winning a tournament is always nice but winning an elite tournament like this is something completely different. I cannot remember the last time an American won a major tournament. "> -- Nakamura (on winning Tata Steel '11) |
|
Feb-13-16
 | | perfidious: <Open Defence: Viswanathan Anand clear second 8.5/13 (+4 -0 =9) is a lacklustre performance???>
Sure is, same as Nakamura's victory in this event was achieved only because he pounded on the tailenders while not being able to win games against the top half. Many posters appear breathtakingly ignorant of the fact that Anand was already aged forty-one at the time of this tournament, same as Kasparov when he called it a career, at a time when the latter had already begun to go into a decline phase--if only by his august standards, as he was no longer clearcut number one. Plus ca change.... |
|
Jun-22-21
 | | MissScarlett: QOTD again today: <I cannot remember the last time an American won a major tournament.> Me neither. Kamsky at Las Palmas (1994) ? Kamsky's bio mentions shared first at Dos Hermanas 1995 but I think a tournament should be won outright to qualify. |
|
 |
 |
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 121 OF 121 ·
Later Kibitzing> |
|
|
|
NOTE: Create an account today
to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users.
Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username,
then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.
|
Please observe our posting guidelines:
- No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
- No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
- No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
- Nothing in violation of United States law.
- No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
- No trolling.
- The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
- Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.
Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic.
This forum is for this specific tournament only. To discuss chess or this site in general,
visit the Kibitzer's Café.
|
Messages posted by Chessgames members
do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration. |
Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!
Copyright 2001-2023, Chessgames Services LLC
|