| page 1 of 4; games 1-25 of 91
|1. Ponomariov vs Anand
||½-½||22||2007||Corus Group A||E06 Catalan, Closed, 5.Nf3|
|2. Karjakin vs Kramnik
||½-½||33||2007||Corus Group A||C42 Petrov Defense|
|3. Topalov vs Motylev
||½-½||24||2007||Corus Group A||D12 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav|
|4. Van Wely vs Radjabov
||0-1||40||2007||Corus Group A||E97 King's Indian|
|5. Navara vs Aronian
||½-½||22||2007||Corus Group A||D38 Queen's Gambit Declined, Ragozin Variation|
|6. Tiviakov vs Carlsen
||½-½||24||2007||Corus Group A||B22 Sicilian, Alapin|
|7. Shirov vs Svidler
||½-½||26||2007||Corus Group A||D86 Grunfeld, Exchange|
|8. Kramnik vs Shirov
||1-0||34||2007||Corus Group A||A15 English|
|9. Svidler vs Tiviakov
||1-0||65||2007||Corus Group A||B01 Scandinavian|
|10. Motylev vs Anand
||0-1||31||2007||Corus Group A||B97 Sicilian, Najdorf|
|11. Carlsen vs Navara
||0-1||50||2007||Corus Group A||D86 Grunfeld, Exchange|
|12. Aronian vs Ponomariov
||1-0||39||2007||Corus Group A||E21 Nimzo-Indian, Three Knights|
|13. Radjabov vs Karjakin
||½-½||78||2007||Corus Group A||E15 Queen's Indian|
|14. Topalov vs Van Wely
||1-0||35||2007||Corus Group A||B90 Sicilian, Najdorf|
|15. Van Wely vs Motylev
||½-½||53||2007||Corus Group A||A20 English|
|16. Ponomariov vs Carlsen
||1-0||30||2007||Corus Group A||D10 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav|
|17. Navara vs Svidler
||½-½||27||2007||Corus Group A||A15 English|
|18. Shirov vs Radjabov
||0-1||47||2007||Corus Group A||E97 King's Indian|
|19. Karjakin vs Topalov
||½-½||54||2007||Corus Group A||B90 Sicilian, Najdorf|
|20. Tiviakov vs Kramnik
||½-½||28||2007||Corus Group A||C43 Petrov, Modern Attack|
|21. Anand vs Aronian
||½-½||32||2007||Corus Group A||C89 Ruy Lopez, Marshall|
|22. Motylev vs Aronian
||½-½||22||2007||Corus Group A||C87 Ruy Lopez|
|23. Kramnik vs Navara
||½-½||63||2007||Corus Group A||A15 English|
|24. Radjabov vs Tiviakov
||1-0||75||2007||Corus Group A||B32 Sicilian|
|25. Carlsen vs Anand
||½-½||20||2007||Corus Group A||B90 Sicilian, Najdorf|
| page 1 of 4; games 1-25 of 91
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 367 OF 367 ·
|Feb-05-07|| ||JointheArmy: <Chess Classics> Note they cut alot of letters sent to them because they were excessively rude as they said.|
I guess I shouldn't have put, "It's official, chessbase is the worst news source for chess."
|Feb-05-07|| ||percyblakeney: GM Sakaev's Corus summary:
Topalov – played with an energy characteristic for him, showing his advantage in the knowledge of opening play almost in every game. If not for the accident against Peter Svidler, he would be the sole winner of the tournament.
Aronian – Levon played very well, easily and strongly, with fantasy. His principal drawback is the opening repertoire, which needs to be still more widened and strengthened, although lately Levon's progress in this sphere has been obvious.
Radjabov – a brilliant start, a good finish, but the burden of leadership has been hanging too heavily on Teimour's shoulders in the middle of the tournament. But it is no matter; for him the time of great achievements is still to come.
Vladimir Kramnik – his play gave joy, his technique in some games was really something else. His victory over Anand is particularly impressive. Unfortunately, it is rather difficult to win the tournament with such kind of opening game for Black (I mean Petroff's Defense and his decision not to play for a win in some games).
Vishi Anand – his defeat in the game against Kramnik has upset him a bit, and the rest of the tournament he played without fervor. It is common knowledge, that Anand can do better than this.
Peter Svidler – a highly unstable play, in some games Peter just gave the points away (but, to tell the truth, he had also got a present from Veselin Topalov). I wish Peter would win some super-tournament at last, his potential is more than enough for that.
Sergey Karjakin – Seriozha played not badly at all. It can be said that he is moving in the right direction. His time is surely to come soon.
David Navara – a "shadow leader" of the tournament. Just like Peter Svidler, he had given away a whole lot of points as presents. David is young and has great potential.
Ruslan Ponomariov – for some reasons he was not in the mood to play. Being at his best advantage, Ruslan is capable of playing much stronger. He had demonstrated this during the recent Tal Memorial in Moscow, where he shared the first place.
Alexander Motylev – Sasha had been "cut down" by the game against Anand in the beginning of the tournament, after which he seemed to lose his self-confidence. Nevertheless, in some games he used to outplay his opponents showing fine opening preparation and interesting play.
Sergei Tiviakov – being conscious of the fact that some participants of this tournament are better players, he made up his mind to play without ambitions, "drying up" the game in order to guarantee himself from a failure. He has succeeded in this, although his final result is not something to boast of anyway.
Loek van Wely – played creatively, won a couple of games, but, with the tournament being as strong as it was, his negative result should not be something to grieve over for Loek.
Alexey Shirov – sharing the last place is undeserved by him. I think that it would come as no surprise to anybody if he had finished in the upper part of the table.
Magnus Carlsen – he is not a mature player yet, so it seems too early to talk about his great perspectives. To my mind, Magnus is, for the time being, weaker than every other participant of this tournament.
|Feb-11-07|| ||rjsolcruz: As Lasker, the 2nd World Champion, said, "Chess is life." Most of us play chess to make friends and making friends is in essence the 2nd most important commandment; love your neigbors. |
God bless all who loves chess! check+
|Feb-11-07|| ||Dionyseus: <percy> Thanks, GM Sakaev's summary was an interesting read.|
|Feb-11-07|| ||Rolfo: <To my mind, Magnus is, for the time being, weaker than every other participant of this tournament.>|
True, but stronger than most of them not participating..
|Feb-12-07|| ||slomarko: <True, but stronger than most of them not participating..>
Kramnik, Grischuk, Mamediarov, Adams, Navara, Ivanchuk, Gelfand etc, etc, etc.. are all stronger than him.|
|Feb-12-07|| ||Rolfo: <Kramnik, Grischuk, Mamediarov, Adams, Navara, Ivanchuk, Gelfand etc, etc, etc.. are all stronger than him.>|
Yes, they are all established players and higher rated as well. No surprise. I suppose you easily can count up a lot more
|Feb-13-07|| ||percyblakeney: Wijk aan Zee stats for some players 1996-2007:
Anand +46 -8 =76
Topalov +33 -21 =63
Kramnik +28 -10 =66
Kasparov +19 -1 =19
Ivanchuk +17 -6 =42
Leko +15 -5 =71
Morozevich +15 -12 =26
Svidler +9 -10 =21
Ponomariov +9 -11 =19
Radjabov +8 -4 =14
Aronian +7 -3 =16
Karjakin +7 -6 =13
Anand went +22 -0 =41 in Wijk from 1999 before losing to Topalov in round 12, 2004. Kasparov's only loss came after 7 wins in a row in 1999, when he blundered against Sokolov. Leko has a draw average just above 10 in 13 games a year. Morozevich had a disastruous 2005, going +2 -6 =5.
|Feb-13-07|| ||percyblakeney: Svidler should be +9 -10 =33.|
|Feb-13-07|| ||percyblakeney: Adams definitely deserves to be included as well, he has had a plus score every year and in total +26 -12 =66.|
|Feb-13-07|| ||shintaro go: +19 -1 =19 is just insane. However, Anand owns Corus, everyone knows that. This year's result won't tarnish his wonderful run in Wijk.|
|Feb-13-07|| ||TylerD: if he "owns" it is only because Kasparov have given it to him by not showing up more often... Anand s record in Corus is fantastic, no argument there, but Kasparov s is even more impressive if one look at quality rather than quantity.
BTW Kasparov s Linares stats... they are just unbelievable... as are all his stats, of course...|
|Feb-23-07|| ||Marvol: I posted this in the Morelinares page but it also fits here.|
1.e4 drawn 31
1.e4 decided 16
1.d4 drawn 19
1.d4 decided 18
1.other drawn 5
1.other decided 2
Interesting is the proportion of Najdorfs in 1.e4, 14
And whether white really profits from the high % of decided games after 1.d4 (these stats may be skewed because of Radjabov's high score in the KID) 1.d4 deciders:
KID 0-1 5 (4x Radja, 1x Topa)
other 0-1 3
|Mar-27-07|| ||AAAAron: Great tourney by Drawnik.... He almost managed the amazing feat of all draws. Oh that Drawnik, always looking for the draw instead of the win. His games are sooo exciting!!! How will Krammy pull off the draw this week. Stay tuned..........|
|Mar-27-07|| ||AAAAron: I admire Topalov greatly, he has that killer instinct. Unlike Kramnik who wets his pants in fear, opting for a draw instead of a fight. I hope Topalov knocks the socks off Drawnik the next time they meet.|
|Jan-09-08|| ||Akuni: <Unlike Kramnik who wets his pants in fear, opting for a draw instead of a fight>|
Looking at the Tal Memorial, it seems you're only about half right. ;)
|Sep-05-08|| ||Whitehat1963: Using my scoring system (below), Radjabov would have been the clear winner: |
My scoring system
Win with black = 1.10
Win with white = 1.00
Draw with black = .50
Draw with white = .45
Loss with either = 0
First four places:
1. Radjabov 8.70
3. Topalov 8.45
3. Aronian 8.45
4. Kramnik 7.85
I dare say, I think my way is better than FIDE's or the current system being used at Bilbao, which would still have yielded a tie at the top:
1. Radjabov 22
1. Topalov 22
3. Aronian 21
4. Kramnik 19
|Sep-13-08|| ||whiteshark: First ??|
|Oct-05-09|| ||DeltaHawk: No comments on this tournament because Magnus Carlsen played extremely poorly.|
|Oct-05-09|| ||kurtrichards: Of Radjabov's 5 victories, 4 comes from King's Indian Defense.(One from Queen's Gambit Declined,Ragozin.) Maybe the reason why Radjabov is called the KID.|
|Oct-06-09|| ||DeltaHawk: LOL, what an error. Apparently, <whiteshark> also thought no comments were made on this tournament.|
|Oct-06-09|| ||8284: <DeltaHawk> LOL, the page counter shows < PAGE 365 OF 367 > for the last page/post. Maybe the admins have deleted some 50 posts without adjusting the total page numbers ?|
|Nov-17-10|| ||checkmateyourmove: i dont think we will ever see a standings like this again.. teimour with first and 5 wins with one loss. He draws to much for my liking now and magnus dead last with no wins. I love corus tourneys.|
|Mar-30-13|| ||perfidious: <checkmateyourmove: i dont think we will ever see....standings like this again....magnus dead last with no wins.>|
I'd say the odds are agin it.
Then again, to hear some tell the sordid tale, a player is only as good as his/her last game.
|Sep-16-13|| ||Kikoman: Magnus Carlsen 1st appearance in Corus (Group A).|
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 367 OF 367 ·
Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!
NOTE: Create an account today
to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users.
Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username,
then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
- No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
- No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
- No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
- Nothing in violation of United States law.
- No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
- No trolling.
- The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
- Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.
Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic.
This forum is for this specific tournament only. To discuss chess or this site in general,
visit the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members
do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.
Copyright 2001-2023, Chessgames Services LLC