page 1 of 2; games 1-25 of 45 |
     |
 |
Game |
| Result | Moves |
Year | Event/Locale | Opening |
1. Naiditsch vs Sutovsky |
  | 1-0 | 28 | 2005 | Dortmund Sparkassen 2005 | B33 Sicilian |
2. P H Nielsen vs Bacrot |
 | 1-0 | 36 | 2005 | Dortmund Sparkassen 2005 | D15 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav |
3. Kramnik vs Svidler |
 | ½-½ | 25 | 2005 | Dortmund Sparkassen 2005 | B44 Sicilian |
4. Leko vs Van Wely |
 | 1-0 | 55 | 2005 | Dortmund Sparkassen 2005 | B31 Sicilian, Rossolimo Variation |
5. Adams vs Topalov |
 | 1-0 | 55 | 2005 | Dortmund Sparkassen 2005 | C43 Petrov, Modern Attack |
6. Svidler vs P H Nielsen |
 | ½-½ | 43 | 2005 | Dortmund Sparkassen 2005 | C42 Petrov Defense |
7. Topalov vs Naiditsch |
 | 1-0 | 27 | 2005 | Dortmund Sparkassen 2005 | D39 Queen's Gambit Declined, Ragozin, Vienna Variation |
8. Leko vs Adams |
 | ½-½ | 21 | 2005 | Dortmund Sparkassen 2005 | C84 Ruy Lopez, Closed |
9. Van Wely vs Bacrot |
 | 1-0 | 47 | 2005 | Dortmund Sparkassen 2005 | E97 King's Indian |
10. Sutovsky vs Kramnik |
  | 1-0 | 51 | 2005 | Dortmund Sparkassen 2005 | C65 Ruy Lopez, Berlin Defense |
11. Naiditsch vs Leko |
  | 1-0 | 59 | 2005 | Dortmund Sparkassen 2005 | B31 Sicilian, Rossolimo Variation |
12. Adams vs Van Wely |
 | 0-1 | 54 | 2005 | Dortmund Sparkassen 2005 | B81 Sicilian, Scheveningen, Keres Attack |
13. Bacrot vs Svidler |
 | ½-½ | 38 | 2005 | Dortmund Sparkassen 2005 | A40 Queen's Pawn Game |
14. P H Nielsen vs Sutovsky |
 | ½-½ | 56 | 2005 | Dortmund Sparkassen 2005 | D87 Grunfeld, Exchange |
15. Kramnik vs Topalov |
  | 1-0 | 41 | 2005 | Dortmund Sparkassen 2005 | E10 Queen's Pawn Game |
16. Adams vs Naiditsch |
 | ½-½ | 37 | 2005 | Dortmund Sparkassen 2005 | B90 Sicilian, Najdorf |
17. Van Wely vs Svidler |
 | ½-½ | 52 | 2005 | Dortmund Sparkassen 2005 | D86 Grunfeld, Exchange |
18. Sutovsky vs Bacrot |
 | 0-1 | 31 | 2005 | Dortmund Sparkassen 2005 | C93 Ruy Lopez, Closed, Smyslov Defense |
19. Leko vs Kramnik |
 | ½-½ | 25 | 2005 | Dortmund Sparkassen 2005 | B46 Sicilian, Taimanov Variation |
20. Topalov vs P H Nielsen |
 | ½-½ | 34 | 2005 | Dortmund Sparkassen 2005 | D63 Queen's Gambit Declined, Orthodox Defense |
21. Bacrot vs Topalov |
 | ½-½ | 93 | 2005 | Dortmund Sparkassen 2005 | A56 Benoni Defense |
22. P H Nielsen vs Leko |
 | 0-1 | 60 | 2005 | Dortmund Sparkassen 2005 | E06 Catalan, Closed, 5.Nf3 |
23. Naiditsch vs Van Wely |
 | ½-½ | 60 | 2005 | Dortmund Sparkassen 2005 | B42 Sicilian, Kan |
24. Kramnik vs Adams |
 | ½-½ | 58 | 2005 | Dortmund Sparkassen 2005 | C91 Ruy Lopez, Closed |
25. Svidler vs Sutovsky |
 | ½-½ | 29 | 2005 | Dortmund Sparkassen 2005 | B31 Sicilian, Rossolimo Variation |
 |
page 1 of 2; games 1-25 of 45 |
     |
|
|
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 98 OF 98 ·
Later Kibitzing> |
Jul-21-05 | | pantlko: <Montreal1666>
1. Van Wely 8
2. Leko 4
3. Topalov 10
4/5. Bacrot/Svidler 9+9
6. Kramnik 10
7/8. Adams Naiditsch 10+3
9. Nielsen 9
10. Sutovsky 9
The total is 81....shared 1st position!!!!!!....whose prediction this is? |
|
Jul-21-05 | | Montreal1666: <pantlko:> Thanks. That was one of the
possibilities for WannaBe (who has tied for 1st). Can you do this one too please: 1. Leko
2. Topalov
3. Svidler
4. Bacrot
5. Kramnik
6. Adams
7. Sutovsky
8. Van Wely
9. Nielsen
10. Naiditsch
|
|
Jul-21-05 | | pantlko: <Montreal1666>
1. Leko 3
2. Topalov 9
3. Svidler 10
4. Bacrot 9
5. Kramnik 9
6. Adams 10
7. Sutovsky 8
8. Van Wely 5
9. Nielsen 9
10. Naiditsch 1
Total is 73 |
|
Jul-21-05 | | Montreal1666: <pantlko:> Thanks. See you |
|
Jul-21-05
 | | lostemperor: Checking on me aren't you <Montreal1666> heheheh. <pantlko> I'm very happy to see you know the calculating method ;) I might just need someone who can help or replace me sometimes and you are a candidate! But you prove I was right. <Montreal1666> was trying to prove I was wrong and that a shared standing prediction would be advantegeous to a non-shared one. Saying that one of the possibilities of WannaBe would result in 81 points also was not the result he was hoping for :). Assuming Adams got 9 and Naiditsch 4 there, your calculations were perfect and resulted in 81 points. But <Montreal1666> that second format I gave of WannaBe's non shared standing prediction, would have resulted in 79 points what is just what you wanted to hear, right ;). I'm afraid I litterally did a number on you! Mistakenly really! I just realize it now. Like I said I was too quick to post that then and I did not really calculate the numbers. WannaBe's prediction
not shared (format 2)
1. Van Wely 8
2. Leko 4
3. Topalov 10
4. Svidler 9
5. Bacrot 8
6. Kramnik 10
7. Naiditsch 4
8. Adams 8
9. Nielsen 9
10. Sutovsky 9
That's 79 points assuming he would have put Nielsen ahead of Sutovski if he may not make a shared standing prediction (and that is a big if). |
|
Jul-21-05 | | Medusa: So, someone interested in telling wich was his favorite game of the tournament????? mine is Van Wely vs Topalov, 2005 |
|
Jul-21-05 | | pantlko: <lostemperor> ok.. i was wrong there..adams got only 9 and naidistch 4. <I'm very happy to see you know the calculating method ;) I might just need someone who can help or replace me sometimes and you are a candidate!> thnks .pls do not hesitate whenever u need any help. |
|
Jul-21-05 | | Montreal1666: <lostemperor> I was actually testing
<pantlko:> to see if he will make a good replacement for you!!!!!. |
|
Jul-22-05 | | pantlko: lol............. |
|
Jul-22-05
 | | lostemperor: Here finally the results of the final standings prediction game 2005 after 4 tournaments Sorry that it took some time. I was kind of busy (and not just here at chessgames.com:)). Thanks for your patience. It was exciting and fun for me and I hope for you too. First place, it may not have slipped your mind, is TIMER*! Congratulations! 16/3 TIMER*
15/3 Troewa*
14/4 Phoenix, Vishyfan
12/3 Annie K.
11/3 fgh*
11/4 Firebyrd* iron maiden*
10 SnoopDogg, WannaBe
10/4 suenteus po 147*, percyblakeney
9/3 bobbyboomer*
8/1 Like a GM
8/2 Neto71*, Chris00nj*,
8/3 gadfly**, assasinator
8/4 acirce
7/1 Montreal1666
7/2. Appaz*, 810609
7/3 Dionyseus
7/4 Elo
6/1 squaredance*, matrix, moonlitknight,
6/2 Shams
6/4 lostemperor*
5/1 jahhaj*, Joshka*, Neto71*, RayMayard*, tanginamo*, tatnho*, thebeginner*, Yannis*, sheaf*, balthez 5/2 OneBadDog*, Sneaky*, Catfriend
5/3 cade*
4/1 tamud*, gladiator367
4/2 child of my tears*, legend*, ranchogrande amuralid, backwardevelopement, kubis, Paul123, 3/1 boganel*, tatnho* TheRaptor*, TylerD* aragorn69, BurningSun cade3, goosey, isolatedpawn, shortsight, tldr3, pyryk pekpekAdik, scorpionfrog, ThePawn 3/2 Ezzy*, farim11*, offramp*, yoozum*, jafar, Kolobok, Nakosonorense, pantlko, PinkPanther , pretendyourlying, Robin01, 3/3 radu stancu*, AgentRgent, where is my mind 3/4 cu8sfan, betsson 2/1 champsupernova , DaveMurray, JimBean Deepfritz8.0 pretendyourlying, weepingwarrior, willc21 2/2 mtolay, 2/3 AdrianP, The Slid 1/1 Mr.siffler*, abaduba, aggresivechess, ahmadov, crumpy, elcliderc,, karpova, r7justin, stevesteve22, GBknight, Dodus, Fulkrum, InfinityCircuit, Ingolf, mulondabl, paradigm, refutor, Ron, sonofabishop, THEpawn, tsj2000, zarra, zorro 1/2 hintza, MinorPieceActivity, moroisthebest, sandyobrien, yourbrilliance. * correct on a tournament winner prediction
If there is a mistake I will hear from you. And indeed, next tournament will be Fide's worldchampionship tournament in September! |
|
Jul-22-05
 | | Annie K.: Wow, how did I make it to fifth place?! Kewl! :D
Thanks, <lostemperor>! :) |
|
Jul-22-05 | | Montreal1666: <Annie K.> You are the best!!! Going back to HP, Why has been in such big success? Hasn't there been many many classics childern books involving magic? |
|
Jul-22-05
 | | Annie K.: Um, nope, only fifth best, at least at this time, and in this tournament. ;) <Going back to HP, Why has been in such big success? Hasn't there been many many classics childern books involving magic?> Sure, but HP is not your average fairy tale. For one thing, Jo Rowling has an excellent sense of humor - those books are FUNNY!!! And she has all the other ingredients for a good read right, too. :) You really should give it a try - maybe from the beginning this time? ;) Another thing about this series is, that the level rises with each book, along with the protagonist's age (each book covers one year). So by HP4, for example, it's more teenage literature than children's, anyway. However, it is fun right from the beginning. :) |
|
Jul-22-05 | | Montreal1666: <Annie K.:> Ok so you are saying the similar past books are not as funny.
Thanks. If you ever decide to write a summary of the HP1, we will all read it with pleasure!!! |
|
Jul-22-05
 | | Annie K.: That I don't want to do, because I would rather people read it for themselves. ;) |
|
Jul-22-05 | | TIMER: <lostemperor> Thanks for the congratulations. I enjoy these events, and I am especially looking forward to the most important tournament of all, the (FIDE)World Championship in September! |
|
Jul-27-05 | | fgh: What? I ended up 5th (or 6th)? Maybe I'am not so bad in making predictions afterall :-) |
|
Jul-28-05 | | witty: Can someone answer my following question:
If there are queens and kings on board and white has one extra pawn on e5, is the game a draw or win for white, or else draw or win depends on kings or queens position? |
|
Jul-28-05 | | Montreal1666: <witty:> you should post this question on Kibitzer's cafe. |
|
Jul-30-05 | | Queens Gambit: I was wondering wich game received the prize to the brilliance game???? |
|
Jan-14-06 | | iron maiden: The dates and format of the 2006 edition of Dortmund were just announced on the homepage of the Aeroflot Open. <As in the three previous tournaments, the organizers of AEROFLOT OPEN 2006 and the super tournament in Dortmund have agreed that the winner of A1 tournament in Moscow will be invited to play in Dortmund from 23 July to 5 August 2006. This year a two-round round-robin tournament of six players (category XIX) will be held.> From http://aeroflotchess.com/. |
|
Jan-14-06 | | Mameluk: Mhm, bad news for chess and mainly for top chessplayers. They won´t have again where to play, A winner, Naiditsch and only 4 spots more with almost 20 elite players... |
|
Jan-14-06 | | diction: yes, a decision like that goes somewhat against the times when there are more and more players in the elite |
|
Jun-30-06 | | suenteus po 147: It seems things have changed slightly since the last post. Rather than six players, this year's Dortmund will feature eight players, but in a single round robin tournament rather than a double. Isn't this extremely low? There will only be 28 games played by the end. |
|
Feb-02-10 | | amadeus: Sauerkraut: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pFH8... |
|
 |
 |
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 98 OF 98 ·
Later Kibitzing> |
|
|
|
NOTE: Create an account today
to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users.
Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username,
then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.
|
Please observe our posting guidelines:
- No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
- No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
- No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
- Nothing in violation of United States law.
- No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
- No trolling.
- The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
- Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.
Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic.
This forum is for this specific tournament only. To discuss chess or this site in general,
visit the Kibitzer's Café.
|
Messages posted by Chessgames members
do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration. |
Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!
Copyright 2001-2023, Chessgames Services LLC
|