Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Hilversum Zonal (1947) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 1 O'Kelly de Galway, Alberic * = = = 1 1 = 1 1 = 1 1 1 1 10.5 Q 2 Pachman, Ludek = * 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 9.5 3 Trifunovic, Petar = 0 * 1 = 1 = = 1 1 = 1 1 1 9.5 4 Van Scheltinga, Theo = 0 0 * 1 0 1 1 1 1 = 1 1 1 9.0 5 Alexander, Conel Hugh 0 1 = 0 * 1 = 0 1 = = = 1 1 7.5 6 Szabo, Laszlo 0 0 0 1 0 * = 1 = 1 = 1 1 1 7.5 7 Blau, Max = 0 = 0 = = * 0 0 1 = 1 1 1 6.5 8 Rossolimo, Nicolas 0 0 = 0 1 0 1 * 1 0 = = 1 1 6.5 9 Castaldi, Vincenzo 0 1 0 0 0 = 1 0 * 0 1 = 1 1 6.0 10 Tsvetkov, Alexandar = 1 0 0 = 0 0 1 1 * 0 0 = 1 5.5 11 Porat, Yosef 0 0 = = = = = = 0 1 * 0 0 1 5.0 12 Plater, Kazimierz 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 = = 1 1 * 0 1 4.5 13 Doerner, Charles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 = 1 1 * = 3.0 14 O'Sullivan, Bartholomew 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 = * 0.5  page 1 of 4; games 1-25 of 91  Game   Result Moves Year Event/Locale Opening 1. Rossolimo vs Pachman 0-1 39 1947 Hilversum Zonal A97 Dutch, Ilyin-Genevsky 2. C Doerner vs T van Scheltinga   0-1 22 1947 Hilversum Zonal D30 Queen's Gambit Declined 3. M Blau vs P Trifunovic   ½-½ 56 1947 Hilversum Zonal C82 Ruy Lopez, Open 4. Y Porat vs C H Alexander   ½-½ 26 1947 Hilversum Zonal A06 Reti Opening 5. B O'Sullivan vs Szabo   0-1 21 1947 Hilversum Zonal E94 King's Indian, Orthodox 6. O'Kelly vs V Castaldi   1-0 23 1947 Hilversum Zonal D68 Queen's Gambit Declined, Orthodox Defense, Classical 7. C Doerner vs Y Porat   1-0 43 1947 Hilversum Zonal A15 English 8. P Trifunovic vs B O'Sullivan   1-0 56 1947 Hilversum Zonal D70 Neo-Grunfeld Defense 9. C H Alexander vs O'Kelly   0-1 45 1947 Hilversum Zonal C64 Ruy Lopez, Classical 10. A Tsvetkov vs Rossolimo   1-0 63 1947 Hilversum Zonal A41 Queen's Pawn Game (with ...d6) 11. V Castaldi vs M Blau   1-0 49 1947 Hilversum Zonal A25 English 12. Pachman vs T van Scheltinga   1-0 24 1947 Hilversum Zonal D44 Queen's Gambit Declined Semi-Slav 13. O'Kelly vs Y Porat   1-0 67 1947 Hilversum Zonal E37 Nimzo-Indian, Classical 14. M Blau vs C H Alexander   ½-½ 61 1947 Hilversum Zonal C63 Ruy Lopez, Schliemann Defense 15. Pachman vs C Doerner   1-0 45 1947 Hilversum Zonal C10 French 16. B O'Sullivan vs V Castaldi 0-1 29 1947 Hilversum Zonal D07 Queen's Gambit Declined, Chigorin Defense 17. T van Scheltinga vs A Tsvetkov   1-0 50 1947 Hilversum Zonal E72 King's Indian 18. K Plater vs P Trifunovic   0-1 43 1947 Hilversum Zonal D31 Queen's Gambit Declined 19. Rossolimo vs Szabo 0-1 44 1947 Hilversum Zonal A13 English 20. A Tsvetkov vs B O'Sullivan   1-0 33 1947 Hilversum Zonal A28 English 21. P Trifunovic vs O'Kelly ½-½ 84 1947 Hilversum Zonal A47 Queen's Indian 22. C H Alexander vs C Doerner   1-0 27 1947 Hilversum Zonal C46 Three Knights 23. Pachman vs K Plater   1-0 56 1947 Hilversum Zonal B24 Sicilian, Closed 24. V Castaldi vs Y Porat   1-0 59 1947 Hilversum Zonal C07 French, Tarrasch 25. Szabo vs M Blau   ½-½ 26 1947 Hilversum Zonal D12 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav  page 1 of 4; games 1-25 of 91    REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2)   May-01-23    perfidious: Bit surprising to see Szabo never be in contention at Hilversum; one would have expected him to qualify. Mar-05-25    Tabanus: Well he played in Saltsjobaden Interzonal (1948) anyway. Mar-05-25    perfidious: A la Spassky, following his plus one at Manila Interzonal (1976), a solid enough score, but hardly what one would have expected of, in his case, a title contender. Mar-05-25    Tabanus: It may be that Budapest (1948) was also a zonal? Mar-05-25    HSOL: <Tabanus>: A bit of research on Mark Weeks' site tells that 16 players (including Szabo) were invited to the Saltsjöbaden Interzonal by FIDE (after a ballot among the FIDE delegates) to add to the few players qualifying by zonals (not that many zonals were played) Mar-05-25    stone free or die: <Tab>, this tidbit is suggestive as regards <Budapest (1948)>: Budapest (1948) (kibitz #1) Mar-05-25    perfidious: <HSOL....(not that many zonals were played)> This is logical, given that this was the first cycle the world championship was held under the auspices of FIDE. Mar-05-25    HSOL: According to the comments on the Budapest 1948 tournament page it might be more of a gray area regarding this FIDE selection with "zonal performances" being a significant part in the election of players than the information I found on Mark Weeks' World Championship site and wikipedia about the Saltsjöbaden 1948 Interzonal Mar-06-25    stone free or die: Yes, according to the <Saltsjobaden> tb the "zonals" had a component of aspirational - <" (but not the winner Alberic O'Kelly de Galway). ... (but not Erich Eliskases) ... Steiner was chosen to represent Australia, and O'Kelly and Eliskases were replaced by Pirc and Lundin. The plan was that the top five from Saltsjobaden and the five (or, as it turned out, four) losers of the FIDE World Championship Tournament (1948) would compete in the Budapest Candidates (1950). But on 12 August, before the penultimate round, FIDE decided that nine players could go to the Candidates. > https://chesscollectorshop.com/prod... Mar-06-25    HSOL: <stone free or die>: Given the book on the collectorshop webpage is most definitely in Swedish, I wonder what the source is for the information about the Saltsjöbaden interzonal on the webpage. I browsed rather shallowly some issues of the Swedish chess federation magazine from 1948 (Tidskrift för schack). It says only 4 zonals were played and one of the winners (which I assume was O'Kelly) was not able to participate so FIDE chose 17 of the participants with a vote. (Source Tidskrift för schack Year 1948 Issue 6-7 (year)page 139. Link below) https://tfsarkiv.schack.se/pdf/1948... Mar-07-25    stone free or die: <<HSOL> I wonder what the source is for the information about the Saltsjöbaden interzonal on the webpage. > Are you talking about the <chesscollectorshop> website? If so, I just assume they used a translation from Stahlberg's tb. But your post has prompted me to think of another option - that perhaps they copied <CG>? I suppose it's a possibility that I should have considered. Mar-07-25    stone free or die: (Of course my alternative conjecture still begs the question of if the material was copied from the tb. If the book site did the original copying it would be ok and assumed. <CG> not so much either way, unless the material didn't come from the tb) Mar-07-25    Olavi: I'll check the Stahlberg tb later today. Mar-07-25    Olavi: The Stahlberg tournamert book has nothing of the sort. The 'zonal performances' is, I believe, pure fabrication. There were four zonals and the rest of 20 players were always meant to be selected by a FIDE qualifications committee; they acknowledged that for this first cycle that has to do and that additional zonals will be planned and held from the next cycle on. Mar-07-25    stone free or die: <Olavi> Saltsjobaden Interzonal (1948) (kibitz #19) (Should have posted it here) NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion. Please observe our posting guidelines: No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members. Nothing in violation of United States law. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members. No trolling. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times. See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator. NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific tournament only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café. Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration. Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes! Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC