Jun-11-10 J Dueball vs E Gereben, 1972 
| |
chinaski: i think 30.Qf3 and 30.Qe4 lead the similar way.
for example:
30.Qf3 Qxf3 31.gxf3 Bc3 32.Bxc3 Rxc3 33.Bxd7 
or 30.Qe4
30...Qxe4 31.Rxe4 Rc4 32.Rxc4 bxc4 33.Bxd7
|
|
| | Jun-09-10 O'Kelly vs Ahlbach, 1938
| |
|
chinaski: Marmot PFL: <chinaski> It was played in 1938 BC (before computers) 1938 BC :))) I liked this abbr.
|
|
| | May-09-10 Gulko vs Y Shulman, 2008
| |
|
chinaski: 22.Rxb7!! Rxb7 23.Qc4(GM Atalik)
|
|
| | May-07-10 Wahltuch vs Capablanca, 1922
| |
chinaski: i think 34..e5 leads the same way too(victory)but its more complicated.for example;
35.Rd1 h4 36.Rg1?? exf4  or 36.gxh4 exf4
more logical;
35.fxe5 h4 36.g4! f4 37.Re1 Ke6
|
|
| | Mar-31-10 Portisch vs Smyslov, 1964
| |
|
chinaski: badest: Isn't Nxc4 also winning ... in just a few more moves? i dont think so.
63.Ne6+ Kc8
64.Qd3 Nxd6
65.Qa6+
|
|
| | Dec-03-09 Kamsky vs Leko, 2008
| |
|
chinaski: FSR: <Check It Out>
<eblunt>
48...Ba3 should eventually win, too, but White can play on with 49.Ra7+ Kg6 50.Kxf3 a1(Q) 51.Nxa3. 51...Qf1+ 52.Ke4 Qf5+ 53.Kd4 Qf2+ or 53.Ke3 Qc5+
|
|
| | | indicates a reply to the comment. | |
