< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 3 OF 3 ·
|Feb-08-12|| ||Crispy Seagull: I watched the Kingscrusher video last night. Really a great game [and entertaining, interesting commentary]. But... could someone please explain why white couldn't just decline the knight? I can't believe a GM couldn't see the position he was saddling himself with after the rook takes.|
|Feb-08-12|| ||hms123: <Crispy Seagull>
White's best is <42.Rh3>
click for larger view
but then Black has <42....Qxf2 43.Qxd5+ Bf7>
skewering the WR at <a2>
If the WQ goes to <h1> (threatening <Rh8+>, then after <...Bxa2> the king can escape via <f7>.
click for larger view
|Feb-09-12|| ||Crispy Seagull: Thanks, HMS. I don't see why white would have to go down that line if it costs him a rook, but I guess that's why I'm not very good ;). I guess his position isn't too hot in any line.|
|Feb-10-12|| ||Ulhumbrus: <Crispy Seagull> Here is one possible answer. After 41...Ne1 if White does not take the knight, Black may play ...Nd3+ and force White's King to either go to d1 and invite the fork ...Nxf2+ or else walk into the diagonal b1-g6 and get exposed to a discovered attack from Black's bishop on g6.|
|Feb-15-12|| ||notyetagm: Game Collection: INTERPOSE! INTERPOSE! INTERPOSE! INTERPOSE!|
|Feb-26-12|| ||sevenseaman: <41...Ne1> is such an 'out of the box' move that I have moved <Aronian> up in my estimation not just a few notches but I clearly see(along with Carlsen) a future World Champion.|
A bright young, budding chess buddy of mine (chesssantosh) was with me about a month ago. He put me on the spot to find Black's 41st move. I found the basic idea of blocking the White K's escape eastward but no way I could put my N there.
Brilliant! And the latter couple of moves too. Stratospheric!
As far as I am concerned the game is permanently barred from ever appearing as a POTD. I will not forget it, just as <Giri> will never.
|Feb-26-12|| ||Ladolcevita: What a splendid game!
Apart from the brilliant move Ne1,I also really adore the general strategy and tactics in this game such as the all-round manoeuvre and the ease of the pace.
|Feb-26-12|| ||King Sacrificer: After watching <kingscrusher>'s video i understood the game better. Does this guy have a super-computer in his brain?|
If Aronian keeps on playing like this, he will be Michael Jordan of chess. I can't wait watching him against Anand!
|Feb-26-12|| ||MORPHYEUS: tut tut.
Why nobody of you experts pointed out that Giri simply lose on the battle of ideas?
Giri's idea of Kg2-Rh1-h4 was simply inappropriate in the position.
|Feb-26-12|| ||erniecohen: <<MORPHYEUS> Giri's idea of Kg2-Rh1-h4 was simply inappropriate in the position.> Agreed. But it looks really tempting.|
Black missed an immediate crush with 27...d2, with the plan of bringing the bishop in on the Q-side, e.g. 28. fxg5 hxg5 29. b8+ k7 30. g3 a4 31. b3 b5 32. bxc4 xc4 33. e1 g8 34. h3 f3 35. b8+ f7 36. xf3 xf3 1-0. It would have been nice to see both sides sac exchanges on the same square.
|Feb-26-12|| ||Penguincw: Anaylsis:
|Feb-26-12|| ||Fanques Fair: Despite Black´s brilliant play, White could continue to resist at the final position with 44- Qxe8 + , Bxe8 ( Qxe8 , Nxc3) 45 -Nc1 , Qg6 , 46 - b5 , although he has almost no chances of survival.|
|Feb-26-12|| ||Xeroxx: Smells like Keene spirit|
|Feb-26-12|| ||naruto00122: 11.Ng5 Interesting play!|
|Feb-27-12|| ||kevin86: A shacking move,that Ne1! like a shot of curare to white's system!|
|Feb-29-12|| ||njchess: Without overdoing it, both GMs play the open for maximum flexibility. White even going so far as to sacrifice a pawn for better piece play on move 7. Black elects to protect the pawn with 8. ... Nb6 and that sets the tone early on. Both players are still in opening preparation through move 12.|
Black's 13. ... Rxf3 is a deep move and a bit of a gamble. At this point, Black has little if any piece play and Aronian just exchanged away his most active piece. He is gambling that his minor piece play activity can trump White's rook play in this position. In more concrete terms, he believes that 15. ... Bc6 together with the half open f-file is worth losing a rook.
Rather than countering Black's strategy with center strengthening moves, White pursues tactics which only help Black's position. 15. Qe4? is a poor move, maybe even a blunder from a strategic point of view. In general, when your opponent is leading or blockading with pawns, counter with pawns unless you are prepared to sacrifice material for positional gain. Here, White's queen is unceremoniously pushed out of the center, and really out of the game.
The sequence of move 16 through 19 is also instructive and is really the turning point in the game. White creates threats with his queen and knight to which Black responds with pawn moves that solidify his position culminating in 19. ... d5. The fact that the bishop is cutoff is minor at this point since White cannot penetrate Black's position on the queen-side at all nor can he generate sustained threats king-side without sacrificing more material.
After move 19, the center is effectively locked for the time being and both players now turn their attention fully to the king-side. However, Black now has the initiative since White must first play Nc3. Now, like his queen, White's knight has few good squares to occupy.
After the expected 20. ... Rf8 from Black, White embarks on, in my opinion, a questionable, king-side attack starting with 21. Ne2. The problem I have with Ne2 is that since f4 and h4 are the logical culminations of this sequence, it threatens to open up the center which is disastrous for White. His king cannot stay on g2 if he plays f4. Moreover, the Ne2, Kg2, Rh1, h4 is way too slow. Aronian easily handles this clumsy attack, picking up a pawn in the process.
In all fairness to GM Giri, I'm not sure what to suggest in terms of moves. Clearly, Black has the better position. The focus of his attack is, for now, f3. The strategy for White should be to shore up his position and look for improvements, not unlike Aronian's strategy. Unfortunately, he is saddled with a nearly useless queen, a knight with few possibilities and rooks with no way to get in the game. Nimzowitsch would be proud!
After 25. ... Nxh4+, it is pretty academic. Black starts with probing attacks on the queen-side, playing on White's unconnected rooks. After some cat-and-mouse, as the position opens up, Black infiltrates White's position first with his bishop and then this knight. Throughout, Black's keeps his pieces well coordinated with his knight and bishop leading the attack buttressed by his rook and queen.
By move 34, White is really just marking time. His only threat down the h-file is simply ignored by Black. With White's pieces in disarray, Black decides to open the center on move 37. What follows is an ingenious, crushing sequence by Aronian capped off by the brilliant 41. ... Ne1!!. First, shades of Nimzowtisch, now Capablanca. Great game from Aronian!
|Mar-02-12|| ||Ulhumbrus: What makes the exchange sacrifice even more impressive is that when preparing it the computer had assessed it as better for White and Aronian disagreed with the computer's evaluation!|
|Mar-02-12|| ||Shams: <Ulhumbrus> No, not Aronian but his second (whose name escapes me) found the move. Aronian properly credited him, so we should too.|
Brilliant idea, to look for novelties that the engine *dislikes* as a way to surprise the opponent. If I were 800 points higher this would totally be my m.o.
|Mar-02-12|| ||cro777: <Shams: No, not Aronian but his second found the move.>|
Position after 12...Bd7
click for larger view
This position was analysed by Aronian's second, the Armenian Grandmaster Arman Pashikian (2618). We should credit him.
Pashikian shared the first two places in the Armenian Chess Championship in 2003 and in 2009 won the title. He also
played for Armenia in the 39th Chess Olympiad in Khanty-Mansiysk in 2o1o.
|Mar-02-12|| ||Atking: Thanks for information <cro777>.
I'm a fan of Anish Giri but on this beautiful game I applaud Aronian and his team. Great preparation but also great execution from the winner of TATA.|
|Mar-03-12|| ||Ulhumbrus: <Shams> <cro777> I stand corrected. As you indicate, it is right that Aronian's second, GM Pashikian, should receive acknowledgment for his discovery.|
I don't remember exactly what Aronian said, perhaps that Pashikian, had found the sacrifice and disagreed with the computer's evaluation.
After listening to Pashikian and looking at the sacrifice himself, Aronian would have had to reach his own conclusion and decide whether to agree with Pashikian. To what extent Aronian had to do his own work I do not know.
|Mar-21-12|| ||Naniwazu: In Aronian's annotations for this game (New in Chess 2012 #2) he writes: "Before this game I had played Anish only once. In the European Team Championship in 2011 I managed to win a good game against him". While this is true the database also contains a game from Tata Steel 2011 and two from Amber.|
|Oct-01-12|| ||LIFE Master AJ: http://www.ajschess.com/thegotmman/...|
My web page ... on this game. (I just finished doing the diagrams today.)
|Oct-02-12|| ||LIFE Master AJ: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2a7E... is my "You-Tube" video for this game.|
|Oct-12-12|| ||LIFE Master AJ: By popular demand (several e-mails), I added a final diagram to my web page.|
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 3 OF 3 ·