| Jan-08-07 |
| Inf: boy gata sure looks young. but i think it was a shame he gave up chess after this WC... 10 years away from chess is too much, now its too late and hard to become a WC nowdays with that many years missing. |
 |
Jan-08-07
 |
| Karpova: The Caro-Kann served Karpov well in this match.
Especially game Nr.4 with very instructive play against an IQP. |
 |
| Jan-11-07 |
| Bobak Zahmat: <but returned to chess in 2004 to resume his goal of becoming World Champion> I think his goal to become World Champion is quite an impossible mission. Today, there are too many Super GM who are stronger than Kamsky. |
 |
Jan-12-07
 |
| positionalgenius: Karpov wins...again. |
 |
| Jan-12-07 |
| Maatalkko: <Bobak Zahmat> Stronger. Not more talented. Kamsky never peaked. |
 |
| Jan-15-07 |
| sitzkrieg: Incredible amount of matches Kamsky won in that short period. |
 |
| Jan-18-07 |
| Dr.Lecter: I saw the Short vs Kasparov, when Kasparov won 12 1/2 to 7 1/2. Why didn't Kamsky and Karpov keep playing, just for the fun of it? |
 |
| Jan-19-07 |
| code13: Dr Lector - Short v Kasparov was a 24 game match, so they didn't keep playing all the games of the match (although they did play 4 games of rapid chess to fulfill the tv contract, which are not included in the 12.5-7.5 score). |
 |
| Feb-17-07 |
| Whitehat1963: This match served as a high-level exploration of the E15 QID (four games). We should be analyzing the @&%$* out of them. |
 |
| Feb-25-07 |
| Dr.Lecter: Oh, I see. Thanks.
Wow! This's my 400th kibitz! |
 |
| Dec-15-07 |
| cotdt: <I think his goal to become World Champion is quite an impossible mission. Today, there are too many Super GM who are stronger than Kamsky.> Not impossible, but it's a tough road ahead. |
 |
| Dec-24-07 |
| Sibahi: This match format sounds nice : why don't they apply it in the next WCs ? |
 |
| Feb-20-09 |
| swarmoflocusts: <I think his goal to become World Champion is quite an impossible mission.> He's only a few games away! |
 |
Feb-20-09
 |
| blacksburg: a few games against topalov and anand. |
 |
Feb-20-09
 |
| drkodos: He has zero wins thus far. That means he is really an infinity away because even if he multiples his efforts to win the WC, it will still amount to: ZERO Good guy, excellent player. Not World Champion Calibre. But then again, neither am I and I think I am just swell and so is Gata. deal
beaches. |
 |
| Feb-20-09 |
| Jim Bartle: "He has zero wins thus far. That means he is really an infinity away because even if he multiples his efforts to win the WC, it will still amount to: ZERO" True, but that can change quickly. I remember the Concorde was the world's safest plane, then had one crash and became statistically the most dangerous. |
 |
| Feb-20-09 |
| swarmoflocusts: <blacksburg>
True, true. Kamsky is at that level, though. Regardless of the result, I have been impressed with his play thus far, especially considering the length of his hiatus; drawing with black against one of the world's best is a good start. (Now he just needs those wins with white. That's the hard part.) <drkodos>
That's a little bit ridiculous. If he wins this next game he's tied the match, and if he wins a few more he's IN THE CHAMPIONSHIP. I would argue that he is quite capable of playing at this level -- he's gotten this far, and he's not doing so badly. |
 |
Feb-21-09
 |
| blacksburg: <and he's not doing so badly.> well, i'm rooting for kamsky, but he is losing. and it is a very short match. and he's never won a game against topalov. doesn't matter anymore if you or i believe that he can beat topalov, the match is on. do or die, no excuses. if he is capable of winning a game against topalov, now would be the time to do so. |
 |
| Feb-21-09 |
| swarmoflocusts: <well, i'm rooting for kamsky, but he is losing. and it is a very short match. and he's never won a game against topalov.> And I; yes, he is; it is, but one game <is> just one game -- he's got plenty of opportunity; that's the hard one to get around, but the past is past and so on and so forth. |
 |
| Feb-21-09 |
| swarmoflocusts: Haha! Yes!! Victory! |
 |
| Jul-29-09 |
| Troller: In 1984, after 18 games the score was 11-7 in Karpov's favour, when 22-year-old Kasparov was playing his first WC match. In 1996, after 18 games the score was 10½-7½ in Karpov's favour, when 21-year-old Kamsky was playing his first WC match. Just saying. Not comparing or anything... |
 |
| Jul-29-09 |
| AnalyzeThis: Very interesting point, Troller. Karpov didn't have the option of just running out the clock on Kasparov, like he did to Kamsky. |
 |