next question.

who deserves to be on the drop down list more?
A.Leonid Stein
B.J. Zukertort
C.Both

Gunsberg?

I don't think the drop down list is meant to be a Hall of Fame, it's supposed to be a quicker way to access the players whose games are viewed most often. That's probably why Zukertort isn't there. People talk about this match a lot, but few actually play over the games.

Not true. Kibitzers who look up games by certain players or certain games by players tend to leave a scent mark, like <Good game> or <White should have played 25.Bxf7+ .. with a winning attack> or <Alekhine was drunk>. Nobodies like Zukertort or Stein have kibitzes on 50% or more of their games. The DD however lists dozens of players (yes, they are GM's, yes, they are rated over 2600) in whose games no one here seems really interested, with 10% or less kibitzed on. When you find a kibitz, it's usually something like: <Why is this game (a 15 move draw against Kramnik from 1992) one of his notable games?>

You're saying the Pulldown list is automated? I never knew that.

<The DD however lists dozens of players (yes, they are GM's, yes, they are rated over 2600) in whose games no one here seems really interested, with 10% or less kibitzed on.>

Did you ever learn to think? What would be the point of asking a question in print of someone who didn't know how to read? Engage brain before putting mouth in motion (or fingers in this case).

To add insult to injury, I'm afraid the error was yours. I wasn't asking how to access the Drop Down Menu, I was asking if there was an easy way to see what percent of players games had been commented on (something that you did <not> in fact explain).

<Take the time limit alone for two players of equal reputation, who may not be disturbed or distracted by the clocks, a difference in the time limit of ten or even five moves an hour would in some cases turn the scale between them. (...) a very notable example: Steinitz and Zukertort.

After the Criterion Great Tournament of 1883 opinions differed much as to which of these was the stronger player, but after the match at 15 moves an hour, in the United States, won by Steinitz with a score of 10 to 5, the palm has been generally awarded to Steinitz, and without any qualification whatever the term of champion of the chess world has been universally accorded to him and still continues to be so, notwithstanding the superior claims of Dr. Tarrasch based upon victory in three successive International Chess Tournaments, Breslan 1889, Manchester 1890, and Dresden in 1892, in the two first named not losing a single game, and in the last, one only, feats never accomplished by Steinitz.